Private and public voices: Does family group conferencing privilege the voice of children and families in child welfare?

Private and public voices: Does family group conferencing privilege the voice of children and families in child welfare?
复制标题

私人和公共声音:家庭小组会议是否优先考虑儿童和家庭在儿童福利方面的声音?

DOI:
10.1080/09649069.2014.967989
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
J. Masson
J. Masson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Connolly;J. Masson

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了使用家庭小组会议在儿童保护,并认为其特权的儿童和家庭谁达到法定的儿童保护服务的注意的声音的能力。家庭小组会议(FGC)是一个家庭在儿童保护方面的决策过程,最初是在新西兰奥特亚罗瓦发展起来的,现在在包括联合王国在内的许多国家实行。在审查与女性生殖器切割有关的文献和研究时,它考虑了这种方法是否提供了真正的参与和伙伴关系背景,或者它是否已经成为一种工具性的专业主导做法,因为家庭对处于风险中的儿童承担了更大的责任。
This article examines the use of family group conferencing in child protection and considers its ability to privilege the voice of children and families who reach the attention of statutory child protection services. The family group conference (FGC) is a process of family decision-making in child protection, originally developed in Aotearoa New Zealand, and now practised in many countries including the UK. Examining the literature and research relating to the FGC it considers whether the approach provides a genuine context of participation and partnership, or whether it has become an instrumental professionally led practice as families are charged with greater responsibilities for children at risk.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1844663
发表时间: 2011
期刊: SSRN Electronic Journal
影响因子: --
作者:
Masson J
通讯作者: Masson J