Translations and Boundaries in the Gap Between HCI Theory and Design Practice
Translations and Boundaries in the Gap Between HCI Theory and Design Practice
复制标题
人机交互理论与设计实践之间的转译和界限
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Reeves
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Velt;S. Benford;S. Reeves
研究与设计实践之间的差距长期以来一直是人机交互社区关注的问题。在本文中，我们探讨了人机交互知识的不同翻译如何弥合这一差距。文献综述将这种差距描述为有两个关键维度：一是一般理论和特定制品之间，二是学术人机交互研究和专业用户体验设计实践之间。我们报道了人机交互研究人员与一家大型媒体公司之间为期 5 年的合作，以探索如何为用户体验从业者翻译人机交互研究的特定部分（即轨迹概念框架）。我们提供了该框架的各种翻译，并将它们放入我们之前确定的空白中。这引导我们完善翻译的概念，表明它们可能由研究人员、从业者主导或作为边界对象由两者共同制作。我们考虑每种方法的好处。
The gap between research and design practice has long been a concern for the HCI community. In this article, we explore how different translations of HCI knowledge might bridge this gap. A literature review characterizes the gap as having two key dimensions—one between general theory and particular artefacts and a second between academic HCI research and professional UX design practice. We report on a 5-year engagement between HCI researchers and a major media company to explore how a particular piece of HCI research, the trajectories conceptual framework, might be translated for and with UX practitioners. We present various translations of this framework and fit them into the gap we previously identified. This leads us to refine the idea of translations, suggesting that they may be led by researchers, by practitioners or co-produced by both as boundary objects. We consider the benefits of each approach.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
S Benford
通讯作者：
S Benford