Cross-language contributions of rapid automatized naming to reading accuracy and fluency in young adults: evidence from eight languages representing different writing systems
Cross-language contributions of rapid automatized naming to reading accuracy and fluency in young adults: evidence from eight languages representing different writing systems
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s41809-021-00092-7
复制
发表时间：
2022-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
George K. Georgiou;C. Cardoso-Martins;J. Das;Alberto Falcón;Miyuki Hosokawa;Tomohiro Inoue;Yixun Li;Dalia Martinez;P. Padakannaya;R. Parrila;T. C. Pollo;Soheil S. Salha;Swagatika Samantaray;H. Shu;Takayuki Tanji;S. Tibi;Ana Paula Alves Vieira
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
George K. Georgiou;C. Cardoso-Martins;J. Das;Alberto Falcón;Miyuki Hosokawa;Tomohiro Inoue;Yixun Li;Dalia Martinez;P. Padakannaya;R. Parrila;T. C. Pollo;Soheil S. Salha;Swagatika Samantaray;H. Shu;Takayuki Tanji;S. Tibi;Ana Paula Alves Vieira
快速自动命名 (RAN) 是跨语言阅读的有力预测指标。然而，目前尚不清楚 RAN 对第一语言 (L1) 的影响是否会转移到第二语言 (L2) 的阅读中，以及结果是否会随着 L1-L2 的拼写接近度而变化。为了填补文献中的这一空白，我们研究了 RAN 在代表不同书写系统的八种语言的阅读准确性和流畅性方面的作用。 735 名大学生（85 名中国学生、84 名日语学生、100 名卡纳达语学生、40 名奥里亚语学生、115 名英语学生、115 名阿拉伯语学生、105 名葡萄牙语学生和 91 名西班牙语学生）参与了我们的研究。他们接受了 RAN（数字和物体）以及 L1 和 L2（英语）阅读（准确性和流畅性）的评估。层次回归分析的结果显示，L1 RAN 对中文、葡萄牙语和西班牙语群体的 L2 阅读准确性有显着影响。此外，L2 RAN 是同一语言组中 L1 阅读流畅度的重要预测因子。在其他语言中没有观察到跨语言迁移。这些发现首先表明，L1 和 L2 RAN 捕获相似的过程，并且控制其中一个不会留下独特的差异供另一个解释。其次，就 RAN 技能的跨语言转移而言，这似乎与语言的拼写接近程度无关。
Rapid automatized naming (RAN) is a strong predictor of reading across languages. However, it remains unclear if the effects of RAN in first language (L1) transfer to reading in second language (L2) and if the results vary as a function of the orthographic proximity of L1–L2. To fill this gap in the literature, we examined the role of RAN in reading accuracy and fluency in eight languages representing different writing systems. Seven hundred and thirty-five university students (85 Chinese-, 84 Japanese-, 100 Kannada-, 40 Oriya-, 115 English-, 115 Arabic-, 105 Portuguese-, and 91 Spanish-speaking) participated in our study. They were assessed on RAN (Digits and Objects) and reading (accuracy and fluency) in both L1 and L2 (English). Results of hierarchical regression analyses showed significant effects of L1 RAN on L2 reading accuracy in the Chinese-, Portuguese-, and Spanish-speaking groups. In addition, L2 RAN was a significant predictor of reading fluency in L1 in the same language groups. No cross-language transfer was observed in the other languages. These findings suggest first that L1 and L2 RAN capture similar processes and controlling for one does not leave unique variance for the other to explain. Second, to the extent there is cross-language transfer of RAN skills, this appears to be independent of the orthographic proximity of the languages.