Adapting a fatigue model for shoulder flexion fatigue: Enhancing recovery rate during intermittent rest intervals.

Adapting a fatigue model for shoulder flexion fatigue: Enhancing recovery rate during intermittent rest intervals.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109762
复制
发表时间:
2020-06-09
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Frey-Law LA
Frey-Law LA
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Looft JM;Frey-Law LA

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

尽管肩袖肌肉容易疲劳,但报告间歇性任务期间扭矩下降的肩部疲劳研究在文献中相对罕见。先前对三室控制器 (3CC) 疲劳模型的修改纳入了休息恢复乘数(3CC-r 模型),以表示休息间隔期间流向肌肉的血流增加。 r=15 的休息恢复值对于踝关节、膝关节和肘关节区域来说是最佳的,而 r=30 对于手/握力肌肉来说则更好。然而,文献中没有肩部扭矩下降数据可供比较。因此,本研究的目的是收集两种不同间歇性、等长肩屈曲疲劳任务的疲劳数据,并与原始 3CC 模型相比,评估 r=15 或 30 的 3CC-r 模型。 20 名健康参与者 (9M) 完成了两项疲劳任务:50% 最大自主收缩 (MVC) 和 50% 占空比 (DC) 以及 70% MVC 和 70% DC。在离散时间点(1,3,5,10 和 15 分钟)评估 MVC,直到耐力时间 (MET)。将这两项任务的平均观察到的扭矩下降百分比 (%TD) 与三个模型估计值进行比较:3CC-r(使用 r=15 和 r=30)和 3CC。使用这些数据,我们确认,使用先前验证的分析疲劳模型 (3CC),添加休息乘数(r = 15 比 r = 30 稍好)可显着改善肩部疲劳的预测。与原始模型相比,模型误差相对大幅减少表明了在休息期间表示增强恢复的重要性。
Although the rotator cuff muscles are susceptible to fatigue, shoulder fatigue studies reporting torque decline during intermittent tasks are relatively uncommon in the literature. A previous modification to the three-compartment controller (3CC) fatigue model incorporated a rest recovery multiplier (3CC-r model) to represent augmented blood flow to muscle during rest intervals. A rest recovery value of r=15 was optimal for ankle, knee, and elbow joint regions, whereas r=30 was better for hand/grip muscles. However, shoulder torque decline data was unavailable in the literature for comparison. Thus, the purpose of this study was to collect fatigue data for two different intermittent, isometric shoulder flexion fatiguing tasks and assess the 3CC-r model with r=15 or 30 compared to the original 3CC model. Twenty healthy participants (9M) completed two fatigue tasks: 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) with 50% duty cycle (DC) and 70% MVC with 70% DC. MVCs were assessed at discrete time points (1,3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes) until endurance time (MET). Mean observed percent torque decline (%TD) for the two tasks were compared to three model estimates: 3CC-r (using r=15 and r=30) and 3CC. Using these data, we confirmed that the addition of a rest multiplier (r = 15 somewhat better than r=30) substantially improved predictions of shoulder fatigue using a previously validated analytical fatigue model (3CC). The relatively large reduction in model errors over the original model suggests the importance of representing augmented recovery during rest periods.
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.1924
发表时间: 2016-06
影响因子: --
作者:
Kinali G;Kara S;Yıldırım MS
通讯作者: Yıldırım MS
DOI: 10.1080/00140130903389068
发表时间: 2010-01
期刊: Ergonomics
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Frey Law LA;Avin KG
通讯作者: Avin KG
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686
发表时间: 2001-12-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Hunter, SK;Enoka, RM
通讯作者: Enoka, RM
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.06.005
发表时间: 2018-08-22
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Looft, John M.;Herkert, Nicole;Frey-Law, Laura
通讯作者: Frey-Law, Laura
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815bbb93
发表时间: 2008-02-01
期刊: MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子: --
作者:
Russ, David W.;Towse, Theodore F.;Kent-Braun, Jane A.
通讯作者: Kent-Braun, Jane A.