Social Groups Prioritize Selective Attention to Faces: How Social Identity Shapes Distractor Interference.

Social Groups Prioritize Selective Attention to Faces: How Social Identity Shapes Distractor Interference.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0161426
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Thayer JF
Thayer JF
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Park G;Van Bavel JJ;Hill LK;Williams DP;Thayer JF

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

人脸会自动吸引视觉注意力,这个过程似乎是由社会群体成员资格引导的。在两个实验中,我们研究了社会群体如何引导对群体内和群体外面孔的选择性关注。黑人和白人参与者在叠加在面孔上的字母串中检测到目标字母(实验 1)。与内群体(白人)干扰面孔相比,白人参与者在种族外群体(黑人)的试验中准确性较低。同样,与内群体(黑人)干扰面孔相比,黑人参与者在种族外群体(白人)的试验中准确性较低。然而,这种外群体偏见模式只有在高感知负荷下(当任务在视觉上很困难时)才会明显。为了检验这种种族偏见模式的可塑性,将一个单独的参与者样本分配到混合种族的最小群体中(实验 2)。无论种族如何,与最少的外组干扰面孔相比,分配到小组的参与者在试验中的准确度较低。同样,这种外群体偏见模式仅在高感知负荷下才明显。总而言之,这些结果表明,当感知资源稀缺时,社会身份会引导选择性注意与动机相关的社会群体,从种族领域的外群体偏见转向极小群体领域的内群体偏见。
Human faces automatically attract visual attention and this process appears to be guided by social group memberships. In two experiments, we examined how social groups guide selective attention toward in-group and out-group faces. Black and White participants detected a target letter among letter strings superimposed on faces (Experiment 1). White participants were less accurate on trials with racial out-group (Black) compared to in-group (White) distractor faces. Likewise, Black participants were less accurate on trials with racial out-group (White) compared to in-group (Black) distractor faces. However, this pattern of out-group bias was only evident under high perceptual load—when the task was visually difficult. To examine the malleability of this pattern of racial bias, a separate sample of participants were assigned to mixed-race minimal groups (Experiment 2). Participants assigned to groups were less accurate on trials with their minimal in-group members compared to minimal out-group distractor faces, regardless of race. Again, this pattern of out-group bias was only evident under high perceptual load. Taken together, these results suggest that social identity guides selective attention toward motivationally relevant social groups—shifting from out-group bias in the domain of race to in-group bias in the domain of minimal groups—when perceptual resources are scarce.