Toward a Synthetic Measure of Good Settlement Form
Toward a Synthetic Measure of Good Settlement Form
复制标题
寻求良好解决形式的综合措施
DOI：
10.1068/b150399
复制
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Banai
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Banai
通过发现城市设计/规划理论和方法存在的差距，本文提出了一种综合方法，一方面将社区设计的“功能性”分析与社区设计的多价值“规范”分析联系起来。萨蒂的层次分析过程(AHP)被用来弥合功能解释和规范解释之间的差距，并协调设计和规划的概念和方法提出的某些两难问题，以解决良好的聚落形式问题。这一新方法在历史悠久的拉德本计划(1929年)的背景下进行了经验测试，该计划以其对社区物理形式和功能的独创性的构思和处理而闻名。运用层次分析法对拉德伯恩规划中隐含的规范性价值进行了“扫描”和“显化”，并展示了土地利用之间的功能(比例)关系是如何受到这些价值影响的。
By discerning a gap existing in urban design/planning theories and methodologies, this paper develops a synthetic approach which sets out to link “functional” analysis on the one side and multivalented “normative” analysis of community design on the other. Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to bridge the gap between functional and normative explanation, and to reconcile certain dilemmas posed by concepts and methods of design and planning in order to address the question of good settlement form. This new approach is tested empirically in the context of the historic Radburn plan (1929), well-known for its ingenuity of conception and treatment of community physical form and function. The AHP is used to “scan” and to make explicit the normative values implicit in the Radburn plan, and the paper shows how the functional (proportional) relationships among the land uses were affected by them.