SOCIAL-INFORMATION-PROCESSING FACTORS IN REACTIVE AND PROACTIVE AGGRESSION IN CHILDRENS PEER GROUPS
SOCIAL-INFORMATION-PROCESSING FACTORS IN REACTIVE AND PROACTIVE AGGRESSION IN CHILDRENS PEER GROUPS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146
复制
发表时间：
1987-12-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
COIE, JD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DODGE, KA;COIE, JD
我们研究了儿童同伴群体中慢性反应性和主动性攻击行为的社会信息加工机制（如敌对归因偏差和意图线索检测缺陷）。在研究1中，教师评价工具，以评估这些行为的小学儿童（N= 259）。反应性和主动性尺度被发现是内部一致的，因子分析部分支持收敛和判别效度。在研究2中，这些形式的侵略行为的相关性进行了检查，通过评估的同龄人（N= 339）。这两种类型的攻击都与社会排斥有关，但只有主动攻击的男孩才被视为领导者和幽默感。在研究3中，我们假设反应性攻击（而不是主动攻击）会发生作为敌对归因偏见和意图线索检测缺陷的函数。四组被社会拒绝的男孩（反应性攻击，积极主动的攻击，反应性积极主动的攻击，和nonaggressive）和一组平均的男孩提出了一系列假设的视频记录的小插曲描绘挑衅的同龄人，并被要求解释的意图的挑衅（N= 117）。只有两个反应性攻击组显示偏见和赤字的解释。在研究4中，归因偏差和赤字被认为是积极的反应性攻击（但不是主动攻击）的速度显示在自由发挥与同龄人（N= 127）。这些研究支持了归因偏差和归因缺陷与反应性攻击有关而与主动性攻击无关的假设。
We examined social-information-processing mechanisms (eg, hostile attributional biases and intention-cue detection deficits) in chronic reactive and proactive aggressive behavior in children’s peer groups. In Study 1, a teacher-rating instrument was developed to assess these behaviors in elementary school children (N= 259). Reactive and proactive scales were found to be internally consistent, and factor analyses partially supported convergent and discriminant validities. In Study 2, behavioral correlates of these forms of aggression were examined through assessments by peers (N= 339). Both types of aggression related to social rejection, but only proactively aggressive boys were also viewed as leaders and as having a sense of humor. In Study 3, we hypothesized that reactive aggression (but not proactive aggression) would occur as a function of hostile attributional biases and intention-cue detection deficits. Four groups of socially rejected boys (reactive aggressive, proactive aggressive, reactive-proactive aggressive, and nonaggressive) and a group of average boys were presented with a series of hypothetical videorecorded vignettes depicting provocations by peers and were asked to interpret the intentions of the provocateur (N= 117). Only the two reactive-aggressive groups displayed biases and deficits in interpretations. In Study 4, attributional biases and deficits were found to be positively correlated with the rate of reactive aggression (but not proactive aggression) displayed in free play with peers (N= 127). These studies supported the hypothesis that attributional biases and deficits are related to reactive aggression but not to proactive aggression.