A meta-analysis of subjective well-being interventions among elders.
A meta-analysis of subjective well-being interventions among elders.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.257
复制
发表时间：
1990-09
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
M. Okun;Robert W. Olding;Catherine M. G. Cohn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Okun;Robert W. Olding;Catherine M. G. Cohn
这项荟萃分析表明，干预措施对治疗后立即对老年人的主观幸福感产生显着的影响（p 小于 0.05），但其有益效果会在 1 个月内消失。对于源自治疗后立即情况（延迟 = 0 天）的 28 个效应大小，中值为 0.67。控制增强 (M = 1.12)、心理教育 (M = 0.70) 和社交活动 (M = 0.66) 治疗的治疗后立即效应大小显着（p 小于 0.05）高于零，并且彼此之间没有显着差异。相比之下，对于延迟后测试场合（延迟大于 0 天）得出的 17 个效应大小，中值为 0.07。对于从立即和延迟后测试的研究中提取的效果大小，30 天期间的平均下降为 1.02。
This meta-analysis demonstrated that interventions have a significant (p less than .05) immediate posttreatment influence on elders' subjective well-being but that their beneficial effect dissipates within 1 month. For 28 effect sizes derived from immediate posttreatment occasions (delay = 0 days), the median value was 0.67. Immediate posttreatment effect sizes for control enhancement (M = 1.12), psychoeducational (M = 0.70), and social activity (M = 0.66) treatments were significantly (p less than .05) above zero and not significantly different from each other. In contrast, for 17 effect sizes derived from delayed posttest occasions (delay greater than 0 days), the median value was 0.07. For effect sizes extracted from studies with both an immediate and a delayed posttest, the mean decrease over a 30-day period was 1.02.