On paracompactness in function spaces with the compact-open topology.

On paracompactness in function spaces with the compact-open topology.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1090/s0002-9939-1971-0276919-3
复制
发表时间:
1971
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
P. O'Meara
P. O'Meara
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. O'Meara

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

空间 X 的 k 网络 (P 是 X 的子集族,使得如果 C C U 具有 C 紧凑且 U 开放,则存在 (P 的成员的有限并集 R,使得 CCLRQ U。Ha 空间是具有可数 ¿ 网络的 r3 空间,it 空间是具有 <r 局部有限 ¿ 网络的 Tr 空间。在本文中,表明如果 X 是无空间且 F 是仿紧 N 空间,那么 G(X, Y),具有紧开拓扑,是仿紧 N 空间。结果意味着,如果 X 是可分离度量,则 G(X, Y) 是仿紧空间。本文的目的是证明某些函数空间是仿紧空间,它具有 E. Michael 的无空间 [3] 的许多属性,但 N 空间不一定是 Lindelöf。无空间可以被表征为 Lindelöf 或遗传可分离的 N 空间 [7],e(X, Y) 将表示配备紧开拓扑的从 X 到 Y 的连续函数的空间,Michael 已经证明,如果 X 和 Y 是无空间,则 Q(X, Y) 也是无空间。 &(X, Y) 是一个仿紧 N 空间。当删除“仿紧”时,不知道前面的陈述是否成立。 定义 1。一个 k 网络(空间 X 的 P 是 X 的子集族,如果 C C U 在 X 中是紧致的,U 是开放的,则存在 (P 的成员的有限并集 R,使得 CERE U。一个网络(空间 X 的 P 是 X 的子集族,如果 X EU 是开放的,则有a P£(P 使得 xEPEU。在 fe 网络的前述定义中,如果有限并集 R 被成员 P£(P 代替,则 (P 称为 X 的伪基)。E. Michael 和 A. Okuyama 分别在 [3] 和 [S] 中研究了具有可数伪基的正则 Pi 空间(即 N0 空间)和具有 c 局部有限网络的空间(即 <r 空间)。 ^-网络可能不是伪基,具有可数^-网络的空间也有可数伪基。编辑于 1970 年 4 月 2 日收到。AMS 1969 主题分类。
A k-network (P for a space X is a family of subsets of X such that if CC U, with C compact and U open, then there is a finite union R of members of (P such that CCLRQ U. An Ha-space is a r3-space having a countable ¿-network and an it-space is a Tr space having a <r-locally finite ¿-network. In this paper, it is shown that if X is an No-space and F is a paracompact N-space, then G(X, Y), with the compact-open topology is a paracompact N-space. The result implies that if X is separable metric and Y is metric, then G(X, Y) is paracompact. The purpose of this paper is to show that certain function spaces are paracompact. We shall introduce a class of spaces called N-spaces which share many of the properties of E. Michael's No-spaces [3], though an N-space need not be Lindelöf. The No-spaces can be characterized as Lindelöf or hereditarily separable N-spaces [7]. Throughout, e(X, Y) will denote the space of continuous functions from X to Y equipped with the compact-open topology. Michael has shown that if X and Y are No-spaces, then so is Q(X, Y). This theorem is generalized in Theorem 1, which states that if X is an N0-space and F is a paracompact N-space, then &(X, Y) is a paracompact N-space. It is unknown whether the preceding statement is true when "paracompact" is deleted. Definition 1. A k-network (P for a space X is a family of subsets of X such that if CC U, with C compact and U open in X, then there is a finite union R of members of (P such that CERE U. A network (P for a space X is a family of subsets of X such that if xEU, with U open, then there is a P£(P such that xEPEU. In the preceding definition of fe-network, if the finite union R is replaced by a member P£(P, then (P is called a pseudobase for X. Regular Pi-spaces with countable pseudobases (i.e., N0-spaces) and spaces with c-locally finite networks (i.e., <r-spaces) have been investigated by E. Michael and A. Okuyama in [3] and [S], respectively. Though a ^-network may not be a pseudobase, a space with a countable ^-network also has a countable pseudobase. Received by the editors April 2, 1970. AMS 1969 subject classifications. Primary 5428, 5450; Secondary 5435.