The Lottery Paradox Generalized?
The Lottery Paradox Generalized?
复制标题
彩票悖论普遍化？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
J. Chandler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Chandler
在最近的一篇文章中，Douven和威廉姆森提供了（i）对最近提出的各种合理可接受性的充分条件的反驳，以及（ii）对这种反驳的所谓“概括”，他们声称，这与更广泛的潜在建议相反。然而，第㈡项中提到的结果不仅不是对第㈠项中提到的调查结果的概括，而且与第㈠项中提到的调查结果相反，它没有宣传其证明力。然而，他们的论文，如果无意中，使我们更接近一个精确的描述一类重要的合理的不可接受的命题-一类彩票命题的等概率彩票。这有助于为构建一个真正能证明彩票悖论的替代方案铺平道路，以取代（i）中所批评的建议。1.可能性与接受度2三个建议和一个反论点。概括反驳的论点？4.彩票悖论：走向一个“正式”的解决方案概率和接受三个建议和一个反驳？彩票博弈：走向“正式”解决方案
In a recent article, Douven and Williamson offer both (i) a rebuttal of various recent suggested sufficient conditions for rational acceptability and (ii) an alleged ‘generalization’ of this rebuttal, which, they claim, tells against a much broader class of potential suggestions. However, not only is the result mentioned in (ii) not a generalization of the findings referred to in (i), but in contrast to the latter, it fails to have the probative force advertised. Their paper does however, if unwittingly, bring us a step closer to a precise characterization of an important class of rationally unacceptable propositions—the class of lottery propositions for equiprobable lotteries. This helps pave the way to the construction of a genuinely lottery-paradox-proof alternative to the suggestions criticized in (i). 1. Probability and Acceptance2. Three Proposals and a Counterargument3. Generalizing the Counterargument?4. The Lottery Paradox: Towards a ‘Formal’ Solution Probability and Acceptance Three Proposals and a Counterargument Generalizing the Counterargument? The Lottery Paradox: Towards a ‘Formal’ Solution