Stressors, resources, and strain at work: A longitudinal test of the triple-match principle
Stressors, resources, and strain at work: A longitudinal test of the triple-match principle
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1359
复制
发表时间：
2006-11-01
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
Dormann, Christian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
de Jonge, Jan;Dormann, Christian
两个纵向研究探讨了工作压力源和工作资源在工作紧张预测中的匹配问题。根据三重匹配原则（TMP），假设如果资源、压力源和应变都匹配，则资源最有可能调节压力源和应变之间的关系。如果（a）只有资源和压力源匹配，（B）只有资源和菌株匹配，或（c）只有压力源和菌株匹配，则资源不太可能缓和压力源和菌株之间的关系。如果压力源、资源和应变之间不匹配，则资源最不可能缓和压力源和应变之间的关系。在2次纵向调查中，对280名和267名卫生保健工作者进行了TMP测试。发现调节效应的可能性与匹配程度呈线性相关，当存在三重匹配时，所有测试的相互作用中有33.3%变得显著，当存在双重匹配时为16.7%，当没有匹配时为0.0%。如果有情感上的匹配或身体上的匹配，结果最一致。
Two longitudinal studies investigated the issue of match between job stressors and job resources in the prediction of job-related strain. On the basis of the triple-match principle (TMP), it was hypothesized that resources are most likely to moderate the relation between stressors and strains if resources, stressors, and strains all match. Resources are less likely to moderate the relation between stressors and strains if (a) only resources and stressors match, (b) only resources and strains match, or (c) only stressors and strains match. Resources are least likely to moderate the relation between stressors and strains if there is no match among stressors, resources, and strains. The TMP was tested among 280 and 267 health care workers in 2 longitudinal surveys. The likelihood of finding moderating effects was linearly related to the degree of match, with 33.3% of all tested interactions becoming significant when there was a triple match, 16.7% when there was a double match, and 0.0% when there was no match. Findings were most consistent if there was an emotional match or a physical match.