Authority and Democracy in Organizations
Authority and Democracy in Organizations
复制标题
组织中的权威与民主
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1977
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lawrence B. Mohr
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lawrence B. Mohr
作为一种风格的监督，被认为是一个因变量。这些数据并没有以任何重要的方式直接支持最初的假设，但是一些有趣的发现间接地出现在更详细的多变量分析中。第一，在这些条款中的监督行为可能会受到主管和下属之间的影响显着。第二，当影响不是一个因素，监督风格是更合理的，与参与取决于下属的培训和他们的感知能力，以建设性地促进决策。第三，参与研究的测量影响理论的发展，在一个重要的方式，因为下属的技术和专业水平可能有显着的影响后，他们的客观水平的参与，但不参与的程度，由他们报告。第四，后一个发现对于那些更常见的将参与视为自变量的研究机构来说意义重大;它可能有助于澄清传统中许多令人困惑和不一致的发现。最后，数据分析表明，一个新的规范性和描述性的概念，在工作场所的民主，这是作为一个竞争对手的权力均衡的方法提供的结论。
Participativeness as a style of supervision is considered as a dependent variable. The data do not directly support the initial hypotheses in any important way, but severalfindings of interest emerge indirectly from a more detailed, multivariate analysis. First, supervisory behavior in these terms is probably influenced significantly by affect between supervisor and subordinates. Second, when affect is not a factor, supervisory style is more rational, with participativeness depending on the training of the subordinates and their perceived capacity to contribute constructively to decision-making. Third, the measurement of participativeness in research affects theoretical development in an important way, since the technical and professional level of subordinates probably has a significant effect upon their objective level of participation but not upon the degree of participation as reported by them. Fourth, the latter finding is significant for the much more common body of research in which participation is treated as an independent variable; it may help to clear up many puzzling and inconsistent findings in that tradition. Lastly, the data analysis suggests a new normative and descriptive conceptualization of democracy in the workplace, which is offered in conclusion as a competitor of the power-equalization approach.