Feasibility of innovative dietary assessment in epidemiological studies using the approach of combining different assessment instruments
Feasibility of innovative dietary assessment in epidemiological studies using the approach of combining different assessment instruments
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s1368980010003587
复制
发表时间：
2011-06-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Boeing, Heiner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Illner, Anne-Kathrin;Harttig, Ulrich;Boeing, Heiner
目的：为了评估短期和长期的饮食评估工具相结合的可行性，为改善日常饮食摄入量评估的新概念，在个人level.Design：可行性研究完成三个24小时的饮食回忆（24-HDR）和自我管理的食物倾向问卷（FPQ）。使用EPIC-SOFT软件，通过每月电话访谈进行24-HDR。FPQ是完全标准化的跨队列和提供无论是作为一个基于网络的工具或在纸的格式。设置：随机样本来自五个正在进行的欧洲队列研究（EPIC-San塞巴斯蒂安、EPIC-Florence、EPIC-Potsdam、爱沙尼亚基因组中心（EGC）和挪威妇女与癌症研究（NOWAC））。总体而言，本研究的总参与率为65.3%（n 261）。平均而言，第一个24-HDR的24-HDR完成率最高（63.0%），第二个（60.3%）和第三个24-HDR（56.3%）略有下降。各研究中心选择基于网络的FPQ的比例各不相同，EGC（92.9%）和NOWAC（70.0%）最高，EPIC-San塞巴斯蒂安（25.5%）和EPIC-波茨坦（33.9%）最低。网络用户很少要求的支持，更年轻，更高的教育程度比那些谁完成了论文format.Conclusions：本研究支持的可行性相结合的应用程序的三个24-HDR和FPQ在文化上不同的人群。不同人群对网络工具的接受程度各不相同，因此需要灵活应用评估工具。
Objective: To assess the feasibility of combining short-term and long-term dietary assessment instruments as new concept for improving usual dietary intake assessment on the individual level.Design: Feasibility study of completing three 24 h dietary recalls (24-HDR) and a self-administered food propensity questionnaire (FPQ). The 24-HDR was conducted by monthly telephone interviews, using EPIC-SOFT software. The FPQ was completely standardized across cohorts and offered either as a web-based tool or in paper format.Setting: Random sample derived from five ongoing European cohort studies (EPIC-San Sebastian, EPIC-Florence, EPIC-Potsdam, Estonia Genome Center (EGC) and Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC)).Subjects: A total of 400 participants.Results: Overall, the total participation rate for the present study was 65.3% (n 261). On average, completion of the 24-HDR was highest for the first 24-HDR (63.0%) and decreased slightly for the second (60.3%) and third 24-HDR (56.3 %). The proportions of selecting the web-based FPQ varied among the study centres, with the highest in EGC (92.9%) and NOWAC (70.0%) and the lowest in EPIC-San Sebastian (25.5%) and EPIC-Potsdam (33.9 %). Web users rarely requested support and were younger and more highly educated than those who completed the paper format.Conclusions: The present study supports the feasibility of a combined application of three 24-HDR and an FPQ in culturally different populations. The varying acceptance of the web-based instrument across populations requires a flexible application of assessment instruments.