Comparison Between Location Based Management and Takt Time Planning

Comparison Between Location Based Management and Takt Time Planning
复制标题

基于位置的管理与节拍时间规划的比较

DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Iris D. Tommelein
Iris D. Tommelein
中科院分区：
--
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adam G. Frandson;O. Seppänen;Iris D. Tommelein

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

建筑规划方法可能会或可能不会明确地将空间建模为资源。本文比较了两种方法。第一种方法用于基于位置的管理系统（LBMS）。第二种方法是节拍时间规划（TTP）。两者都是用于规划和控制施工工作的迭代设计方法，都侧重于创建具有可预测工作时间的平衡生产计划，同时防止行业之间的空间干扰，但它们在如何实现这些目标方面有所不同。本文的贡献是（1）突出这两种方法之间的相似性和差异，（2）描述了一个建议，为未来的探索性研究，以评估系统使用通用指标。
Construction planning methods may or may not explicitly model space as a resource. This paper compares two methods that do. The first method is used in the Location Based Management System (LBMS). The second method is Takt Time Planning (TTP). Both are iterative design methods for planning and controlling construction work, both focus on creating a balanced production schedule with a predictable timing of work while also preventing spatial interference between trades, but they differ in how they achieve these goals. The contribution of this paper is to (1) highlight the similarities and differences between these two methods and (2) describe a proposal for future exploratory research to evaluate the systems using common metrics.