The role of quality assurance and standardization in the safety of botanical dietary supplements
The role of quality assurance and standardization in the safety of botanical dietary supplements
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/tx7000493
复制
发表时间:
2007-04-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Farnsworth, Norman R.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
van Breemen, Richard B.;Fong, Harry H. S.;Farnsworth, Norman R.
The importance of complementary and alternative therapies such as botanical dietary supplements continues to increase throughout the world (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that the majority of people in developing countries depend on traditional and herbal medicines as their primary source of health care (2). In the United States, 42% of the population have reported using complementary and alternative medicines, especially botanical dietary supplements (3), costing an estimated $5.1 billion per year (4). The marketing and use of dietary supplements has grown rapidly in the United States following the passage of the ‘Dietary Supplement and Health Education Act’in 1994, which exempts dietary supplements from regulation as drugs providing that they are not marketed for the diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevention of disease (5).Although the use of botanical dietary supplements has increased substantially during the last two decades, evidence for their efficacy and safety has not been well documented. In the United States for example, botanical dietary supplements are currently exempt from good manufacturing practice, do not require proof of efficacy, and do not require pre-marketing approval by the FDA unless drug-like claims are made. The safety of botanical dietary supplements is the responsibility of the manufacturers, and the role of the FDA in safety assurance is limited to post-marketing monitoring of adverse effects. Since no disease treatment or prevention benefits may be claimed for dietary supplements, they are exempt from FDA regulation, and efficacy studies for these products are relatively rare.