Can we do better than frequency ? A case study on extracting PP-verb collocations

Can we do better than frequency ? A case study on extracting PP-verb collocations
复制标题

我们能做得比频率更好吗？

DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Evert
S. Evert
中科院分区：
--
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brigitte Krenn;S. Evert

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们认为，词汇关联度量（AM）应该根据从完整候选数据中手动提取的搭配参考集进行评估，并且需要精确定义搭配的概念，以便人类的搭配判断和实验结果是可重复的。我们表明，特定 AM 实现的识别结果并不主要取决于文本类型，但某些 AM 比其他 AM 更适合识别某些类别的搭配。
We argue that lexical association measures (AMs) should be evaluated against a reference set of collocations manually extracted from the full candidate data, and that the notion of collocation needs to be precisely defined so that human collocativity judgments and experimental results are reproducible. We show that identification results achieved by particular AMs do not crucially depend on text type, but that some AMs are much better suited for identifying some classes of collocations than others.