A Resonant Message: Aligning Scholar Values and Open Access Objectives in OA Policy Outreach to Faculty and Graduate Students
A Resonant Message: Aligning Scholar Values and Open Access Objectives in OA Policy Outreach to Faculty and Graduate Students
复制标题
引起共鸣的信息：在面向教师和研究生的 OA 政策推广中调整学者价值观和开放获取目标
DOI：
10.7710/2162-3309.2152
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Otto
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Otto
引言教师贡献的机构知识库是一个主要的限制因素，在成功地提供开放获取奖学金，从而提高研究生产力和进步。许多人通过研究教师不愿做出贡献的原因而间接提到了外展信息，但具体的开放获取信息被证明最能引起教师的共鸣，但还没有足够的粒度进行讨论。事实上，许多教师的利益和关注可能要么是未知的教师自己，或不说，所以文学的教师的好处和开放存取的看法的记录仍然是不完整的。项目描述在罗格斯大学，我们制定了一个有针对性的信息，既解决了这些不言而喻/未知的担忧和好处，又说明了开放获取在不断变化的学术交流格局中的承诺和必然性。本文详细介绍了这一信息及其基本原理，根据文献的批判性审查，目前通知外展计划，以引发进一步讨论的具体外展信息和原则的基础上。一个强大的学术交流组织、开放获取政策咨询委员会、扩大的外联和持续的势头对于确保取得可衡量的成果至关重要。应根据开放获取外联工作和工具的管理目标，重新评估用于评估开放获取政策实施工作和机构知识库的工具。希望对信息和指标的重新评估能够更好地与开放获取的真正承诺和先决条件保持一致。
INTRODUCTION Faculty contribution to the institutional repository is a major limiting factor in the successful provision of open access to scholarship, and thus to the advancement of research productivity and progress. Many have alluded to outreach messages through studies examining faculty concerns that underlie their reluctance to contribute, but specific open access messages demonstrated to resonate most with faculty have not been discussed with sufficient granularity. Indeed, many faculty benefits and concerns are likely either unknown to the faculty themselves, or unspoken, so the literature’s record of faculty benefits and perceptions of open access remains incomplete at best. DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM At Rutgers University, we have developed a targeted message that both addresses these unspoken/unknown concerns and benefits and speaks to the promise and inevitability of open access in a changing scholarly communication landscape. This paper details that message and its rationale, based on a critical review of the literature currently informing outreach programs, in order to provoke further discussion of specific outreach messages and the principles underlying them. NEXT STEPS A robust scholarly communication organization, open access policy advisory board, expanded outreach, and sustained momentum will be critical to ensuring success with measurable outcomes. Metrics used to evaluate both OA policy implementation efforts and institutional repositories should be reevaluated in light of the governing objectives of open access outreach efforts and tools. It is hoped that a reassessment of the message and the metrics will better align both with the true promise and prerequisites of open access.