Clinical validation of S100B in the management of a mild traumatic brain injury: issues from an interventional cohort of 1449 adult patients

Clinical validation of S100B in the management of a mild traumatic brain injury: issues from an interventional cohort of 1449 adult patients
复制标题

DOI:
10.1515/cclm-2018-0471
复制
发表时间:
2018-11-01
影响因子:
6.8
通讯作者:
Bouvier, Damien
Bouvier, Damien
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Allouchery, Gautier;Moustafa, Fares;Bouvier, Damien

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:本研究的主要目的是通过前瞻性研究验证S100 B的常规使用。目的是减少30%的头颅计算机断层扫描(CCT)扫描。次要目标是调查年龄和相关危险因素对减少CCT.Methods的影响:S100 B(3小时内采样伤后)被用于轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBIs)的患者提出了中等风险的并发症,需要CCT扫描。S100 B阴性(S100 B-)患者出院时未进行CCT扫描。32.3%的患者有S100 B-,敏感性为96.4%,特异性为33.4%(95%CI:31%-36%),阴性预测值为99.6%(95%CI:98.5%-99.9%)。如果患者有逆行性遗忘(0.16 μ g/L; 63.8%)、意识丧失(0.13; 63.6%)或抗血小板治疗(0.20; 77.9%),则未观察到血清水平或S100 B+率的显著差异。年龄> 65岁组与年龄< 55岁组(18-25岁、26-35岁、36-45岁、46-55岁)比较,血清S100 B浓度及阳性率差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。18 ~ 65岁(n = 874),特异性为39.3%(95% CI:36%-42.6%)与18.7%相比(95%CI:15.3%-22.3%)。结论:临床使用S100 B治疗mTBI可减少约三分之一的CCT使用;此外,CCT减少的百分比受患者年龄的影响。
Background: This study's primary objective was to validate the routine use of S100B via a prospective study. The aim was a reduction of cranial computed tomography (CCT) scans by 30%. The secondary goal was to investigate the influence of age and associated risk factors on the reduction of CCT.Methods: S100B (sampling within 3 h postinjury) was used for patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBIs) presenting a medium risk of complications and requiring a CCT scan. Patients with negative S100B (S100B-) were discharged without a CCT scan.Results: Of the 1449 patients included in this study, 468 (32.3%) had S100B-with a sensitivity of 96.4% (95% CI: 87.5%-99.6%), a specificity of 33.4% (95% CI: 31%-36%) and a negative predictive value of 99.6% (95% CI: 98.5%-99.9%). No significant difference in serum levels or the S100B+ rate was observed if patients had retrograde amnesia (0.16 mu g/L; 63.8%), loss of consciousness (0.13; 63.6%) or antiplatelet therapy (0.20; 77.9%). Significant differences were found between the S100B concentrations and S100B positivity rates in patients > 65 years old and all the groups with patients < 55 years old (18-25, 26-35, 36-45 and 46-55). From 18 to 65 years old (n = 874), the specificity is 39.3% (95% CI: 36%-42.6%) compared to 18.7% (95% CI: 15.3%-22.3%) for patients > 65 years old (n = 504).Conclusions: The clinical use of S100B in mTBI management reduces the use of CCTs by approximately one-third; furthermore, the percentage of CCTs reduction is influenced by the age of the patient.