The relationship between trait hostility and cardiovascular reactivity: a quantitative review and analysis.
The relationship between trait hostility and cardiovascular reactivity: a quantitative review and analysis.
复制标题
特质敌意与心血管反应性之间的关系：定量回顾和分析。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02087.x
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Wan,CK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Suls,J;Wan,CK
一系列Meta分析的结果表明，大多数特质敌对措施的高分和低分者在血压或心率对传统实验室压力源的反应性方面并不一致。当压力源被分为刺激性和非刺激性时，雅阁与情境方法相一致，然而，潜在敌意-人际风格预测了夸大的收缩压和舒张压反应，Cook-Medley敌意量表预测了舒张压对刺激性压力源的反应。因此，下一代的忠诚反应假说的研究应该强调人际压力源。然而，也应该研究敌对情绪的疾病后果的替代机制，因为现有的证据表明，高反应性假说不太可能为敌对情绪和心脏病之间的关联提供完整的解释。
Results of a series of meta‐analyses indicated that high and low scorers on most trait hostility measures do not consistently differ in blood pressure or heart rate reactivity to traditional laboratory stressors. The few significant effects were modest in size, and instances of hyporeactivity were found. When stressors were classified as provocative versus nonprovocative, in accord with Trait x Situation approaches, however, Potential for Hostility‐Interpersonal Style was predictive of exaggerated systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses and the Cook–Medley Hostility Inventory was predictive of diastolic blood pressure responses to provocative stressors. Hence, the next generation of studies of the hostility–reactivity hypothesis should emphasize interpersonal stressors. Alternative mechanisms for the disease consequences of hostility should also be examined, however, because the available evidence indicates that the hyperreactivity hypothesis is unlikely to furnish a complete explanation for the association between hostility and heart disease.