Association of Angiotensin Modulators With the Course of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Association of Angiotensin Modulators With the Course of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.015
复制
发表时间:
2019-10-01
期刊:
影响因子:
9.6
通讯作者:
Cottin, Vincent
Cottin, Vincent
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kreuter, Michael;Lederer, David J.;Cottin, Vincent

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

血管紧张素肽与特发性肺纤维化(IPF)发病机制有关。血管紧张素调节剂用于治疗动脉高血压(IPF的常见合并症)。该事后分析评估了IPF.METHODS中抗高血压治疗与疾病相关结局的相关性:CAPACITY和ASCEND研究中随机分配至安慰剂组的所有患者(n = 624)均按基线抗高血压治疗进行分类。疾病进展结局(首次发生%预测FVC绝对下降>= 10%,6分钟步行距离下降>= 50米,或死亡)和全因死亡率在52 wk内进行评估。结果:基线时,111和121例患者分别接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB);第392章都没收到在校正基线特征差异后的多变量分析中,与非ACEi/ARB组相比,ACEi治疗(风险比[HR],0. 6 [95% CI,0. 4 - 0. 9]; P = 0. 026)与疾病进展较慢相关,而ARB治疗(HR,0. 9 [95% CI,0. 6 - 1. 2]; P = 0. 413)与疾病进展较慢相关。此外,在ACEi组中未观察到与心血管疾病相关的全因死亡率增加(HR,1.1 [95% CI,0.5-2.9]; P = 0.782),其IPF相关死亡率百分比与非ACEi/ARB组相似(3.6% vs 3.6%)。相反,ARB组患者的全因死亡风险更高(HR,2.5 [95% CI,1.2-5.2])。这些观察结果在包括INSPIRE试验患者的汇总分析中得到了验证。结论:需要前瞻性临床试验来评估血管紧张素调节剂是否可能对IPF的临床结局有益。
RACKGROUND: Angiotensin peptides have been implicated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) pathogenesis. Angiotensin modulators are used to treat arterial hypertension, a frequent comorbidity of IPF. This post hoc analysis evaluated associations of antihypertensive treatments with disease-related outcomes in IPF.METHODS: All patients randomized to placebo (n = 624) in the CAPACITY and ASCEND studies were categorized by antihypertensive treatment at baseline. Outcomes of disease progression (first occurrence of >= 10% absolute decline in % predicted FVC, >= 50-m decline in 6-min walk distance, or death) and all-cause mortality were assessed over 52 weeks.RESULTS: At baseline, 111 and 121 patients were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), respectively; 392 were receiving neither. In multivariable analyses adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics compared with the non-ACEi/ARB group, ACEi treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4-0.9]; P = .026), but not ARB (HR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.6-1.2]; P = .413), was associated with slower disease progression. Furthermore, the increase in all-cause mortality associated with cardiovascular disease was not observed in the ACEi group (HR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.5-2.9]; P =.782), which presented a similar percentage of IPF-related mortality as the non-ACEi/ARB group (3.6% vs 3.6%). In contrast, patients in the ARB group had greater risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2-5.2]). These observations were validated in a pooled analysis that included patients from the INSPIRE trial.CONCLUSIONS: Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate whether angiotensin modulators may be beneficial to clinical outcomes in IPF.