Disparate goals, progressive ideals? Professional biographies of planners in the UK and their ideas of 'mission'
Disparate goals, progressive ideals? Professional biographies of planners in the UK and their ideas of 'mission'
复制标题
不同的目标，进步的理想？
DOI：
10.1080/02697459.2023.2289274
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Clifford B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clifford B
在本文中，我们利用传记访谈的数据来研究英国规划师所持有的价值观，以及他们是否以及如何在日常工作中促进进步的规划理想，尽管往往在规划系统和组织优先事项的反倾向。我们的研究赞同温和进步，但保守的定位的想法：在Hillier（2002）的术语，一些规划师是“在一个使命”，但这些使命不同，从共同利益的方向，做“更好”的规划，在一个假定的公共利益的愿望，以更公正为基础的承诺，某些进步的“事业”，如特定的公众，文化遗产，特殊的地方，或环境。
In this paper, we utilise data from biographical interviews to examine the values held by UK planners and whether and how they promote progressive planning ideals in their everyday work, often despite countertendencies in planning systems and organisational priorities. Our research concurs with the idea of a mildly progressive, yet conservative, positioning: in Hillier’s (2002) terms, some planners are ‘on a mission’ but these missions vary from common-good orientations, a desire to do ‘better’ planning in a putative public interest, to more justice-based commitments to certain progressive ‘causes’ such as particular publics, cultural heritage, special places, or the environment.