Learning from Wind Power
Learning from Wind Power
复制标题
向风电学习
DOI：
10.1057/9781137265272_4
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Power S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Power S
对于许多评论家来说，20年来推广陆上风能的一个关键教训是，“规划系统”是该行业扩张的障碍。这一主张已在一些欧洲国家提出（Bruns等人，2011年; Khan 2003年;但在英国，围绕规划过程的冲突已经引起了工业界和政府的抱怨，（Cowell 2007）。尽管它很刺耳，这种关于“交付的规划障碍”的论述在其对部署问题的分析中过于简单化（参见Toke 2005 a），但在其规划观点中也有些自相矛盾，或至少是不完整的。这是自相矛盾的，因为重要的社会关注风力发电，包括对景观，视觉舒适，野生动物和噪音的影响，在不同的空间。这表明，某种形式的规划，引导发展远离敏感地点，走向更可接受的地点，应该减少冲突，并导致更积极的同意决定。事实上，正是由于这些原因，许多评论家呼吁更好的位置指导，包括上文引用的Kenworthy（也可参见Hindmarsh 2010; IEEP 2009; Warren and Birnie 2009）。空间规划方法可能为市场推动的“风”提供更好的策略，开发商急于开发最具商业吸引力的位置，导致
For many commentators, a key lesson from 20 years of promoting on-shore wind energy is that ‘the planning system’is an impediment to expansion of the sector. This claim has been voiced in a number of European countries (Bruns et al. 2011; Khan 2003; Wolsink 1996) but has become something of a mantra in the UK, where the conflict surrounding planning processes has attracted complaints from industry and government (Cowell 2007).For all its stridency, this discourse of ‘planning barriers to delivery’is simplistic in its analysis of deployment problems (see Toke 2005a) but also somewhat paradoxical, or at least incomplete, in its view of planning. It is paradoxical because important social concerns about wind power–including impacts on landscape, visual amenity, wildlife and noise–vary across space. This suggests that some form of planning, to steer development away from sensitive locations and towards more acceptable sites, ought to reduce conflict and lead to more positive consent decisions. Indeed, it is precisely for these kinds of reasons that numerous commentators have called for better locational guidance, including Kenworthy, quoted above (see also Hindmarsh 2010; IEEP 2009; Warren and Birnie 2009). Spatial planning approaches may offer a preferable strategy to market-fuelled ‘wind rushes’, where developers dash to exploit the most commercially attractive locations, leading to