Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
复制
发表时间：
2007-04-01
影响因子：
12
通讯作者：
Schunn, Christian D.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cho, Kwangsu;Schunn, Christian D.
本文描述了基于网络的相互对等评论系统如何支持写作实践的剑（脚手架写作和重写）如何支持写作实践，尤其是对于大型内容课程而言，其中写作被认为是至关重要的，但不包括在内。为了帮助学生获取内容知识以及写作和审查技能，Sword通过将期刊出版过程作为其真实的实践模型来支持整个写作，评论，背面评论和重写的整个周期。此外，Sword还包括计算单个审阅者的审查准确性的算法，这又用于支持相互同行评审的各种弊端（例如，审阅者的动机或能力的变化）。最后，本文描述了一种经验评估，表明剑方法可有效提高内容类别的写作质量。 （c）2005 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。
This paper describes how SWoRD (scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline), a web-based reciprocal peer review system, supports writing practice, particularly for large content courses in which writing is considered critical but not feasibly included. To help students gain content knowledge as well as writing and reviewing skills, SWoRD supports the whole cycle of writing, reviews, back-reviews, and rewriting by scaffolding the journal publication process as its authentic practice model. In addition, SWoRD includes algorithms that compute individual reviewer's review accuracy, which is in turn used to support the various drawbacks of reciprocal peer reviews (e.g., variation in motivation or ability of reviewers). Finally, this paper describes an empirical evaluation showing that the SWoRD approach is effective in improving writing quality in content classes. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.