Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-Brief (BFNE) and the BFNE-Straightforward for Middle School Students
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale-Brief (BFNE) and the BFNE-Straightforward for Middle School Students
复制标题
中文版负面评价恐惧量表(BFNE)和中学生BFNE-Straightforward的心理测量学特性
作者：
Jia Wei;Chunyu Zhang;Yadan Li;Song Xue;Jinfu Zhang
研究背景：12条目的恐惧负面评价量表（BFNE）是目前应用最广泛的评估负面评价恐惧的工具之一。最近的证据强烈支持由8个简单项目组成的版本（BFNE-S），它具有更强的心理测量学性质。本研究旨在考察BFNE和BFNE-S中文版的中学生心理测量学特征。方法采用问卷调查法，对1009名中学生进行调查。497名受试者接受了BFNE、BFNE-S、Friedman-Bendas文本焦虑量表（FBTAS）和社交焦虑量表（SAS）的测试，其中52名受试者在四周后接受了重新测试。BFNE、BFNE-S、Rosenberg自尊量表（RSES）和理想反应平衡量表（BIDR）对492名参与者进行了测量。BFNE和BFNE-S与各量表的相关显著，支持其聚合效度、发散效度和并发效度。BFNE-S的Cronbach’s α值为0.864（0.867）（497人）和0.886（0.844）（492人），重测信度系数为0.791（0.855）（ICC）。虽然EFA确定了一个双因素解决方案，其中8个直向项目加载在一个因素上，4个反向项目加载在另一个因素上，CFA使用随机截距模型来控制措辞效应，支持BFNE的一维因素结构。EFA和CFA都支持BFNE-S的一维假设。两个样本的BFNE和BFNE-S的相关系数分别为0.929和0.952。结论BFNE和BFNE-S中文版具有足够的心理测量学特征来评估对负面评价的恐惧。研究结果支持中国中学生使用该量表。考虑到其更大的简约性和良好的信度和效度，BFNE-S是一个更好的工具。
Background The 12-item brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE) is one of the most widely used instruments to assess fear of negative evaluation. Recent evidence strongly supports the version composed of 8 straightforward items (BFNE-S), which possessesstronger psychometric properties. The purpose of the current study is to examine the psychometric prop-erties of the Chinese versions of the BFNE and BFNE-S for middle school students. Methodology A total of 1009 middle school students were recruited in this study. The BFNE, the BFNE-S, the Friedman-Bendas Text Anxiety Scale (FBTAS), and the Social Anxiety Scale (SAS) were administered to 497 participants, and 52 participants were re-tested after four weeks. The BFNE, the BFNE-S, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) wereadministered to 492 participants. The BFNE and BFNE-S significantly cor-related with all the scales, supporting their convergent, divergent and concurrent validity. Principal Findings The Cronbach's alpha of the BFNE (BFNE-S) was 0.864 (0.867) with 497 par-ticipants and 0.886 (0.844) with 492 participants, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.791 (0.855) (ICC). Although the EFA identified a two-factor solution in which the 8 straightfor-ward items loaded on one factor and the 4 reversed items loaded on the other, the CFA, using a random intercept model to control the wording effect, supported a unidimensional factor struc-ture of the BFNE. Both EFA and CFA supported the unidimensional assumption of the BFNE-S. The correlations of the BFNE and BFNE-S were 0.929 and 0.952 in two samples. Conclusions The Chinese versions of the BFNE and BFNE-S demonstrate adequate psychometric properties for assessing fear of negative evaluation. The results support their use among the Chinese middle school students. Considering its greater parsimony and excellent reliability and validity, the BFNE-S is a better tool.
社交焦虑症患者对阳性评估量表的恐惧的心理测量评估。
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Weeks, Justin W.;Heimberg, Richard G.;Rodebaugh, Thomas L.;Goldin, Philippe R.;Gross, James J.
通讯作者：
Gross, James J.
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
MACCALLUM, RC;WEGENER, DT;FABRIGAR, LR
通讯作者：
FABRIGAR, LR