A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration
A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00220970109600653
复制
发表时间：
2001-12-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Hacker, DJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bol, L;Hacker, DJ
研究了实践测试对学生多项选择题和作文题的校准和考试成绩的影响。参与者是59名研究生注册在I的2个部分（实践测试和没有实践测试）的介绍性研究方法在教育课程。实践测试与中期多项选择题的得分显着降低，以及对这些项目的预测和预测不准确有关。成绩优异的学生比成绩差的学生更准确地校准，在低成就的学生，预测和postdiction的准确性显着高于多项选择题。在开放式的回答中，很大一部分参加模拟考试的学生表示，模拟考试是一种有益的复习策略。
The impact of practice tests on students' calibration and exam performance for multiple-choice and essay items was investigated. The participants were 59 graduate students enrolled in I of 2 sections (practice tests and no practice tests) of an introductory research methods in education course. Practice tests were associated with significantly lower scores on the midterm multiple-choice items and less accurate predictions and postdictions on those items. High-achieving students were more accurate in their calibrations than low-achieving students, Among low-achieving students, prediction and postdiction accuracy was significantly higher for essay than for multiple-choice items. In open-ended responses, a large percentage of students who took the practice tests indicated that they were a beneficial review strategy.