A critique of Latour and Woolgar's argument for the social construction of scientific facts in laboratory Life: the construction of scientific facts (1986)
A critique of Latour and Woolgar's argument for the social construction of scientific facts in laboratory Life: the construction of scientific facts (1986)
复制标题
对拉图尔和伍尔加关于实验室生活中科学事实的社会建构的论点的批评：科学事实的建构（1986）
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bakuwa Japhet
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bakuwa Japhet
布鲁诺·拉图尔和史蒂夫·伍尔加著。这是通过以下方式完成的：对正文中的论点进行总结；将正文(和作者)与当时的学术研究联系起来；评估作者是否成功地实现了本书的总体目的。Suffice说，尽管他们主张科学事实的社会结构，但他们对事实的社会结构的描述可能不会让那些仍然认为社会(或人类)和科学fic是两个互不相容的世界的研究者信服。
by Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. This is done by: presenting a summary of the arguments in the text; contextualising the text (and the authors) in the scholarship of the time; and assessing whether the authors have succeeded in carrying out the overall purpose of the book. Suffi ce to say that much as they argue for the social construction of scientifi c facts, their account of the social construction of facts is probably unconvincing to those researchers who still conceive the social (or human aff airs) and the scientifi c as two incompatible worlds.