Legal Rights and Moral Rights: Old Questions and New Problems*
Legal Rights and Moral Rights: Old Questions and New Problems*
复制标题
法律权利和精神权利：老问题和新问题*
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-9337.1996.tb00233.x
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
A. Sen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Sen
摘要。作者考察了道德权利的纪律，特别是将其嵌入相应系统的必要性。他认为，人们普遍认为不受后果性评价的影响是保障个人自由的正确方式，但这种观点是建立在对道德权利在社会背景下的作用评估不足的基础上的。从这个角度来看，他研究了两个具体的案例：(1)基本的政治和公民权利，(2)人口快速增长的贫穷国家背景下妇女的生殖权利。他认为，一个连贯的目标-权利体系，在其他目标中容纳权利，可以克服非结果性论点，并在结果性观点中充分证明道德权利的力量。
Abstract. The author examines the discipline of moral rights and in particular the need to embed them in a consequential system. He argues that the widely held opinion that independence from consequential evaluation is the right way of guaranteeing individual freedom is based on an inadequate appraisal of the role of moral rights in the social context. In this perspective he examines two specific cases: (1) elementary political and civil rights, and (2) the reproductive rights of women in the context of poor countries with the problem of fast population growth. He argues that a coherent goal-rights system which accommodates rights among others goals, can overcome the non-consequential arguments and justify the force of moral rights fully within a consequentiality perspective.