Effectiveness of Simulated Horseback Riding for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of Simulated Horseback Riding for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
复制标题

DOI:
10.1123/jsr.2018-0252
复制
发表时间:
2020-02-01
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Yoon, BumChul
Yoon, BumChul
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kim, TaeYeong;Lee, JaeHyuk;Yoon, BumChul

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:模拟骑马(SHR)运动对改善疼痛和功能残疾是有效的,但其与其他运动的比较有效性尚不清楚。目的:研究SHR运动对慢性下腰痛患者的治疗效果。设计:随机对照试验设置:社区和大学校园。对象:将48例慢性下腰痛患者随机分为2组,分别进行自发性高血压运动(SHR,n=24)和稳定运动(STB,n=24)。干预:每周2次,每次30min,共8周。主要观察指标:在基线、4周、8周和6个月时测量数字评定量表、功能残疾(奥斯威斯蒂残疾指数和罗兰-莫里斯残疾)和恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)得分。结果:双因素方差分析显示,组间比较与工作量表相关的FABQ差异有统计学意义(F=21.422;P=0.01)。在数字评定量表(F=1.696;P=.21)、奥斯维斯特残疾指数(F=1.848;P=.20)、罗兰莫斯残疾(F=0.069;P=.80)和与体格有关的常见问题问卷(F=1.579;P=.24)方面,两组间差异无统计学意义。在组内比较中,两组在数字评分(4wk后SHR和STB)、OSwestry残疾指数(6mo后SHR和STB)和Roland-Morris残疾(6mo后SHR和8wk后STB)方面与基线值相比均有显著差异。在FABQ相关体格(4wk后的SHR)和工作量表(6mo后的SHR)中,只有SHR与基线值有显著差异。结论:SHR锻炼8周比STB锻炼对减少工作相关FABQ的效果更好。在坐姿下进行SHR锻炼可以显著减少患有慢性下腰痛的年轻人与疼痛相关的恐惧残疾。
Context: A simulated horseback riding (SHR) exercise is effective for improvement of pain and functional disability, but its comparative effectiveness with the other is unknown. Objective: The authors aimed to demonstrate the effect of a SHR exercise in people with chronic low back pain. Design: A randomized controlled triaL Settings: Community and university campus. Participants: A total of 48 participants with chronic low back pain were divided into 2 groups, and SHR exercises (n = 24) or stabilization (STB) exercises (n = 24) were performed. Interventions: The exercises were performed for 30 minutes, 2 days per week for 8 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Numeric rating scale, functional disabilities (Oswestry disability index and Roland-Morris disability), and fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) scores were measured at baseline and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months. Results: A 2-way repeated analysis of variance identified that between-group comparisons showed significant differences in the FABQ related to work scale (F= 21.422; P= .01). There were no significant differences in the numeric rating scale (F= 1.696; P = .21), Oswestry disability index (F= 1.848; P = .20), Roland-Moths disability (F= 0.069; P = .80), and FABQ related to physical scale (F = 1.579; P = .24). In within-group comparisons, both groups presented significant differences in numeric rating scale (both SHR and STB after 4 wk), Oswestry disability index (both SHR and STB after 6 mo), and Roland- Morris disability (SHR after 6 mo and STB after 8 wk) compared with baseline values. In FABQ-related physical (SHR after 4 wk) and work scales (SHR after 6 mo), there were only significant differences in the SHR compared with baseline values. Conclusions: SHR exercise for 8 weeks had a greater effect than STB exercise for reducing work-related FABQ. The SHR exercise performed in a seated position could substantially decrease pain-related fear disability in young adults with chronic low back pain.