Do Violent Acts Equal Abuse? Resolving the Gender Parity/Asymmetry Dilemma
Do Violent Acts Equal Abuse? Resolving the Gender Parity/Asymmetry Dilemma
复制标题
暴力行为等于虐待吗？
DOI：
10.1007/s11199-009-9717-2
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
E. Stark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Stark
这篇评论回顾了Langhinrichsen-Rohling（2010）在“美国涉及性别和亲密伴侣暴力的争议”中的一个核心困境，即如何调和伴侣使用武力中的性别平等与伴侣虐待的动态和影响中的性别不对称。这种困境是家庭暴力模式的副产品，这种模式混淆了家庭和关系中暴力的规范使用，以及倡导运动所针对的伴侣攻击和强制控制的类型。我认为，在服务点出现的虐待受害者的维度与范式的基本假设相矛盾，并概述了另一种强制控制模式，将暴力行为置于其历史，经验和政治背景中。
This commentary revisits a core dilemma in “Controversies involving Gender and Intimate Partner Violence in the United States” by Langhinrichsen-Rohling (2010), how to reconcile gender parity in the use of force by partners with the gender asymmetry in the dynamics and effects of partner abuse. This dilemma is a byproduct of a domestic violence paradigm that confounds the normative use of violence in families and relationships and the types of partner assault and coercive control targeted by the advocacy movement. I argue that the dimensions of abuse victims present at points of service contradict the basic assumptions of the paradigm and outline an alternative model of coercive control that sets violent acts in their historical, experiential and political context.