Lexical priming on Neely's (1977) paradigm in Parkinson's disease: where do we stand?
Lexical priming on Neely's (1977) paradigm in Parkinson's disease: where do we stand?
复制标题
Neely (1977) 帕金森病范式的词汇启动：我们处于什么位置？
DOI：
10.1076/jcen.21.3.301.921
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Spicer,K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brown,GG;McDonald,C;Spicer,K
在两项已发表的研究中，我们使用了Neely（1977）词汇决策范式的变体来研究帕金森病非痴呆个体的注意转移和自动词汇激活（McDonald，Brown，& Gorell，1996;斯派塞，Brown，& Gorell，1994）。Arnott和Chenery（出版中）注意到尼利的结果与我们在对照组中观察到的结果之间的差异，这对McDonald等人（1996）和斯派塞等人（1994）论文中提出的一些结论提出了质疑。即使考虑到Neely（1977）的结果与我们的对照组之间的重要差异，我们认为我们的结果支持帕金森病中正常的自动语义激活和缺乏集合转移的结论。我们还引入了广义启动的概念，以解释我们研究中观察到的一些启动效应。
In two published studies, we used a variant of Neely's (1977) lexical decision paradigm to study shifts of attention and automatic lexical activation in nondemented individuals with Parkinson's disease (McDonald, Brown, & Gorell, 1996; Spicer, Brown, & Gorell, 1994). Arnott and Chenery (in press) noticed differences between Neely's results and the results we observed in our control group that raise questions about some of the conclusions presented in the McDonald et al. (1996) and Spicer et al. (1994) papers. Even when considering the important differences between Neely's (1977) results and those in our control groups, we argue that our results support the conclusions of normal automatic semantic activation and deficient set-shifting in Parkinson's disease. We also introduce the notion of generalized priming to account for some of the priming effects observed in our studies.