Evaluation of the physiological significance of leaf wetting by dew as a supplemental water resource in semi-arid crop production

Evaluation of the physiological significance of leaf wetting by dew as a supplemental water resource in semi-arid crop production
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106964
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
G. Yokoyama;D. Yasutake;Keisuke Minami;Kensuke Kimura;Atsushi Marui;Wu Yueru;Jiaojiao Feng;
G. Yokoyama;D. Yasutake;Keisuke Minami;Kensuke Kimura;Atsushi Marui;Wu Yueru;Jiaojiao Feng;
中科院分区:
农林科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Yokoyama;D. Yasutake;Keisuke Minami;Kensuke Kimura;Atsushi Marui;Wu Yueru;Jiaojiao Feng;

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

露水是一种经常观测到的气象现象,其对干旱和半干旱地区水平衡的重要性已得到公认。我们的研究重点是评估潜在的意义,叶面湿润露水半干旱作物生产的植物生理功能的影响。我们在西北地区的玉米地进行了田间试验。露水湿润叶片发生在45%的天在培养期间,叶水势较高的露水湿润的叶片比那些没有润湿在上午。此外,我们进行了一个盆栽玉米控制实验,包括四个处理(两个不同的土壤水分处理:水胁迫和充分浇水,和两个不同的叶片湿润处理:有和没有叶片湿润)。水分胁迫处理强烈抑制植物生理功能(叶水势降低,气孔关闭,光合速率降低),因此,生长速率下降。而在水分胁迫下的湿润区,玉米叶片在夜间从表面吸收水分,显著提高了黎明前的叶水势。因此,该小区表现出较高的光合速率比水分胁迫无叶湿润小区在白天。在水分充足的小区中,叶片湿润对植物生理功能的正效应不明显。我们认为,叶片湿润的积极影响主要表现为对植物水分关系的影响,这种影响可能是有限的,当植物有足够的水分。结果表明,叶片湿润的水分胁迫植物表现出更高的水分利用效率。我们的研究结果表明,露水湿润叶作为一种水资源在半干旱作物生产中的重要性,因为它对植物生理功能的影响。
Dew is a frequently observed meteorological phenomenon and its importance to the water balance in arid and semi-arid regions has been recognized. The focus of our study was to evaluate the potential significance of leaf wetting by dew on semi-arid crop production in terms of its effects on plant physiological functions. We conducted a field experiment in a maizefield in northwest China. Leaf wetting by dew occurred on 45% of days during cultivation periods, and leaf water potential was higher for leaves wetted by dew than for those not wetted during the morning. In addition, we conducted a potted maize control experiment consisting of four treatments (two different soil water treatments: water-stressed and well-watered, and two different leaf wetting treatments: with and without leaf wetting). The water-stressed treatment strongly inhibited plant physiological functions (decrease in leaf water potential, stomatal closure, decrease in photosynthetic rate); therefore, growth rate decreased. However, in the water-stressed with leaf wetting plot, the maize leaves absorbed water from their surfaces during nighttime, which significantly increased pre-dawn leaf water potential. Consequently, this plot showed a higher photosynthetic rate than did the water-stressed without leaf wetting plot during daytime. The positive effects of leaf wetting on plant physiological functions were not explicit in the well-watered plots. We assumed that the positive effects of leaf wetting were mainly manifest as effects on plant–water relations; such effects may be limited when plants have sufficient water. As a result, water-stressed plants with leaf wetting showed greater water use efficiency. Our results indicate the importance of leaf wetting by dew as a water resource in semi-arid crop production owing its effects on plant physiological functions.