Performing the Union: the Prüm Decision and the European dream.

Performing the Union: the Prüm Decision and the European dream.
复制标题

执行联盟:普吕姆决定和欧洲梦。

DOI:
10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.009
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
V. Toom
V. Toom
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Prainsack;V. Toom

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

2005年,七个欧洲国家签署了所谓的《普吕姆条约》,以加强打击国际犯罪、恐怖主义和非法移民方面的跨国合作。三年后,该条约被纳入欧盟法律。欧盟成员国现在必须建立适当的系统,允许其他成员国的当局在 2011 年 8 月之前访问国家保存的有关 DNA、指纹和车辆的数据。在本文中,我们讨论了 Prüm 网络出现的可能性条件,并认为 Prüm 的(历史)历史不是朝着技术和政治融合与协调的线性上升,而是异质且断断续续的。这也反映在实施普吕姆决定的早期阶段,事实证明,该决定比普吕姆进程推动者所希望的更具挑战性。从这个意义上说,普鲁姆网络与法证科学的成功故事(其中许多都是为了证明技术和监视系统的扩张的合理性)的关系令人不安。普吕姆的故事不是讲述英雄的科学故事,而是阐述欧洲梦想:让商品、服务和人民自由、安全地生活和旅行。
In 2005, seven European countries signed the so-called Prüm Treaty to increase transnational collaboration in combating international crime, terrorism and illegal immigration. Three years later, the Treaty was adopted into EU law. EU member countries were now obliged to have systems in place to allow authorities of other member states access to nationally held data on DNA, fingerprints, and vehicles by August 2011. In this paper, we discuss the conditions of possibility for the Prüm network to emerge, and argue that rather than a linear ascent towards technological and political convergence and harmonisation, the (hi)story of Prüm is heterogeneous and halting. This is reflected also in the early stages of implementing the Prüm Decision which has proven to be more challenging than it was hoped by the drivers of the Prüm process. In this sense, the Prüm network sits uncomfortably with success stories of forensic science (many of which served the goal of justifying the expansion of technological and surveillance systems). Instead of telling a story of heroic science, the story of Prüm articulates the European dream: one in which goods, services, and people live and travel freely and securely.