The effect of post-acute rehabilitation setting on 90-day mobility after stroke: A difference-in-difference analysis.

The effect of post-acute rehabilitation setting on 90-day mobility after stroke: A difference-in-difference analysis.
复制标题

急性后康复设置对中风后 90 天活动能力的影响:双重差分分析。

DOI:
10.1101/2024.01.08.24301026
复制
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Raghavan,Preeti
Raghavan,Preeti
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
French,MargaretA;Hayes,Heather;Johnson,JoshuaK;Young,DanielL;Roemmich,RyanT;Raghavan,Preeti

文献摘要

相似文献

BackgroundAfter discharged from the hospital for acute stroke, individuals typically receive rehabilitation in one of three settings: inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), or home with community services (i.e., home health or outpatient clinics). The initial setting of post-acute care (i.e., discharge location) is related to mortality and hospital readmission; however, the impact of this setting on the change in functional mobility at 90-days after discharge is still poorly understood. The purpose of this work was to examine the impact of discharge location on the change in functional mobility between hospital discharge and 90-days post-discharge.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we used the electronic health record to identify individuals admitted to Johns Hopkins Medicine with an acute stroke and who had measurements of mobility [Activity Measure for Post Acute Care Basic Mobility (AM-PAC BM)] at discharge from the acute hospital and 90-days post-discharge. Individuals were grouped by discharge location (IRF=190 [40%], SNF=103 [22%], Home with community services=182 [(38%]). We compared the change in mobility from time of discharge to 90-days post-discharge in each group using a difference-in-differences analysis and controlling for demographics, clinical characteristics, and social determinants of health.ResultsWe included 475 individuals (age 64.4 [14.8] years; female: 248 [52.2%]). After adjusting for covariates, individuals who were discharged to an IRF had a significantly greater improvement in AM-PAC BM from time of discharge to 90-days post-discharge compared to individuals discharged to a SNF or home with community services (β=−3.5 (1.4), p=0.01 and β=−8.2 (1.3), p=<0.001, respectively).ConclusionsThese findings suggest that the initial post-acute rehabilitation setting impacts the magnitude of functional recovery at 90-days after discharge from the acute hospital. These findings support the need for high-intensity rehabilitation and for policies that facilitate the delivery of high-intensity rehabilitation after stroke.