Co-creation: moving towards a framework for creating innovation in the Triple Helix

Co-creation: moving towards a framework for creating innovation in the Triple Helix
复制标题

共同创造:迈向三螺旋创新框架

DOI:
10.1080/08109028.2014.971613
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Prometheus
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hughes T
Hughes T
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hughes T

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文的目的是展示服务主导逻辑(S-D 逻辑)的理论思想如何通过大学、行业和政府之间的合作有效地应用于创新。围绕 S-D 逻辑的争论激发了对三个领域的大量讨论,这些领域与考虑三螺旋内知识的共同创造特别相关。第一个领域涉及了解所有相关方提供的资源的性质以及整合这些资源的过程。第二个领域涉及相关各方之间的互动。第三个也是最复杂的领域涉及不同各方如何看待价值。这次讨论提出了共同创造过程的拟议模型和四个建议的研究议程: 研究议程一,着眼于各方提供的资源及其整合;研究议程二,关于增强共同创造的互动实践;研究议程三,探索什么样的价值主张能够激励各方共同创造;研究议程四,考虑共同创造如何改变相关各方的资源。提出了一个共同创造过程的模型,该模型包含这四个研究议程,并提供了一个分析三螺旋倡议的概念框架。然后讨论了与研究人员面临的挑战相关的一些实际意义。
The objective of the paper is to demonstrate how the theoretical ideas of service-dominant logic (S-D logic) can usefully be applied to innovation through collaboration among university, industry and government. The debate around S-D logic has stimulated much discussion of three areas that are particularly pertinent in considering the co-creation of knowledge within the Triple Helix. The first area relates to understanding the nature of the resources provided by all the parties involved and the process through which they are integrated. The second area relates to interaction among the parties involved. The third and most complex area relates to how value is perceived by the different parties. This discussion leads to a proposed model of the co-creation process and four suggested research agendas: Research Agenda One, looking at the resources supplied by the parties and their integration; Research Agenda Two, concerning the interaction practices that enhance co-creation; Research Agenda Three, exploring what value propositions will motivate the different parties to co-create; and Research Agenda Four, considering how co-creation modifies the resources of the parties involved. A model of the co-creation process that encompasses these four research agendas and provides a conceptual framework to analyse Triple Helix initiatives is proposed. Some practical implications are then discussed relating to the challenges posed for researchers.
在线消费者社区、协作学习和创新
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Carla Rossi
通讯作者: Carla Rossi
DOI: --
发表时间: 2006
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Corcoran
通讯作者: M. Corcoran
三螺旋实践:边界扳手的关键作用
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
H. Lundberg
通讯作者: H. Lundberg
知识管理中的管理问题
DOI: --
发表时间: 2001
影响因子: 7
作者:
J. Lang
通讯作者: J. Lang
DOI: --
发表时间: 2003
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Dietrich;T. Oxman;John W. Williams
通讯作者: John W. Williams