Long-term impact of socio-economic changes on agricultural land use in the Polish Carpathians
Long-term impact of socio-economic changes on agricultural land use in the Polish Carpathians
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.013
复制
发表时间：
2017-05-01
期刊：
影响因子：
7.1
通讯作者：
Bucala-Hrabia, Anna
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bucala-Hrabia, Anna
研究了 1846 年至 2009 年期间社会经济变化对 Ochotnica 村（105 km(2)）以及波兰喀尔巴阡山脉 Jaszcze 和 Jamne 流域的土地利用的影响。对地图、航空照片、历史和人口普查报告的分析表明，在调查期间，奥乔特尼察的森林面积增加了 77%，Jaszcze 和 Jamne 流域的森林面积分别增加了 29% 和 43%，而两个流域的耕地面积都减少了 94%。人口密度从33人/平方公里增加到50人以上(2)，而农业就业率从98%下降到30%以下。分析的时期显示了土地利用的不同趋势，涉及波兰喀尔巴阡山脉社会经济发展的三个阶段。直到第二次世界大战之前，农业用地的贡献是人类活动历史上最高的。第二次世界大战后，继承了过去的共产主义土地利用结构维护制度。 1989 年之后引入的自由市场经济迫使森林面积实现了自戈尔斯山脉首次殖民化以来的最大增幅。与西欧中山区不同的是，人口密度的下降并没有伴随着森林的扩张，小农场在所有制体系中的主导地位也没有随之而来。 (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
The impact of socio-economic changes on land use on the period 1846-2009 are studied in village of Ochotnica (105 km(2)) and the Jaszcze and Jamne catchments in the Polish Carpathians. The analysis of maps, aerial photos, historical and census reports indicates that during the investigated period the forest area in Ochotnica increased by 77% and in the Jaszcze and Jamne catchments by 29% and 43%, respectively and cultivated land decreased by 94% in both catchments. The population density increased from 33 to more than 50 people/km(2), while employment in agriculture decreased from 98% to below 30%. The analysed period shows diverging trends of land use, referring to the three stages of socio-economic development in the Polish Carpathians. Until World War II, agricultural land contribution was the highest throughout the history of human activity. After World War II, a communist maintenance system of the land use structure was inherited from the past. A free market economy, introduced after 1989, forced the largest increase in forest area since the first colonisation of the Gorce Mountains. In contrast to the mid-mountains of Western Europe, a decrease in population density did not accompany forest expansion, nor did a dominance of small farms in the ownership system. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.