Statistical Relations between Precipitation Formation and Quantities of Synoptic Field
Statistical Relations between Precipitation Formation and Quantities of Synoptic Field
复制标题
降水形成与天气场数量的统计关系
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1978
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
H. Sakakibara
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Sakakibara
Growth of ice crystals by sublimation in supercooled clouds and that of cloud droplets by capturing smaller droplets in water clouds are considered to be the main mechanisms in precipitation formation. The former depends on the degree of supercooling and the concentration of ice crystals while the latter depends on the size distribution of cloud droplets, liquid water content and updraft in clouds. It would be still difficult to predict decisively whether or not precipitation will result from a certain cloud from the aforementioned microphysical parameters, because the observations of such elements throughout the cloud layer are difficult and the physical relationships among them are highly complicated. For predicting precipitation, it will be suitable to make use of statistical relations among the precipitation and more easily observable quantities about the cloud layer, such as cloud-top temperature and cloud thickness, at least for the operational purposes. The temperature at cloud top is adopted as an index of precipitation formation by the ice process, because, roughly speaking, both the concentration of ice crystals and the growth rate by sublimation depend on temperature. The cloud thickness is adopted as an index of precipitation formation by the coalescence process, because both of liquid water content and updraft are correlated with the cloud thickness, especially in the case of convective clouds. Many researchers have studied the relation between the temperature at cloud top and precipitation formation, and that between the cloud thickness and precipitation formation basing on the detailed observation for individual clouds (e.g. Braham et al. (1951), Battan and Braham (1956), Mason and Howorth (1952), Stewart (1964)). From the relations they tried to decide which process, that is, the ice process or the coalescence process, is principal for various cases of precipitations. In this paper, however, we intend to discuss precipitation formation from the synoptic view point on the basis of the radiosonde, radar and surface observation data and to contribute to the diagnosis of precipitation formation in a certain synoptic field.