Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account
Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03193807
复制
发表时间：
2006-02-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Park, H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Diana, RA;Reder, LM;Park, H
大多数识别记忆的计算模型都是基于单一过程的解释，声称熟悉度是识别的唯一影响。越来越多的证据表明，认知实际上是基于两个过程：回忆和熟悉。本文回顾了双加工模型的证据的现状，包括记住/知道范式的有用性，并解释了相关结果的激活混淆（SAC）模型的记忆。我们认为，我们讨论的每个领域的证据，当结合起来，提出了一个强有力的情况下，包括一个回忆过程是必要的。鉴于这一结论，我们还认为，双进程的索赔，回忆过程总是可用的，事实上，更简约比单进程的索赔，回忆过程只用于某些范式。一个良好的指定的过程模型，如SAC模型的价值进行了讨论，关于其他类型的双过程模型。
The majority of computationally specified models of recognition memory have been based on a single-process interpretation, claiming that familiarity is the only influence on recognition. There is increasing evidence that recognition is, in fact, based on two processes: recollection and familiarity. This article reviews the current state of the evidence for dual-process models, including the usefulness of the remember/know paradigm, and interprets the relevant results in terms of the source of activation confusion (SAC) model of memory. We argue that the evidence from each of the areas we discuss, when combined, presents a strong case that inclusion of a recollection process is necessary. Given this conclusion, we also argue that the dual-process claim that the recollection process is always available is, in fact, more parsimonious than the single-process claim that the recollection process is used only in certain paradigms. The value of a well-specified process model such as the SAC model is discussed with regard to other types of dual-process models.