Approaching media industries comparatively: A case study of streaming

Approaching media industries comparatively: A case study of streaming
复制标题

比较接近媒体行业:流媒体案例研究

DOI:
10.1177/1367877918813245
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
L. Marshall
L. Marshall
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Daniel Herbert;A. Lotz;L. Marshall

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

虽然“流媒体”在多个媒体行业中变得越来越普遍,但显著的差异支撑了允许这种行为的行业实践,并解释了跨行业互联网分发的差异体验。本文采用合作比较媒体行业分析,调查在美国音乐,电影和电视行业的流媒体之间的共性和差异,以评估理论化的文化影响的可行性流媒体作为一个一致的现象,跨媒体行业。本文探讨了流媒体在消费者体验,商业实践和文本含义之间的差异和分歧,以比较既定的用途,生产实践和媒体内容如何受到互联网分销的影响。这种详细的行业比较是一种新颖的方法,本文还考虑了不同媒体行业专家学者之间严格合作的方法论价值。该分析是基于行业数据和实践,通过行业新闻,行业报告,并与媒体工作者的采访与关键媒体行业的方法一致。
Although ‘streaming’ media has become increasingly common across multiple media industries, significant differences underpin the industrial practices that allow this behavior and explain discrepant experiences of internet distribution across industries. This article uses collaborative comparative media industry analysis to investigate the commonalities and variations among streaming in the US music, film, and television industries to assess the viability of theorizing the cultural implications of streaming as a consistent phenomenon across media industries. The article explores the consistencies and divergences of streaming among consumer experience, business practices, and textual implications to compare how established uses, production practices, and media content have been affected by internet distribution. Such detailed industry comparison is a novel approach, and the article also considers the methodological value of rigorous collaboration among scholars expert in different media industries. The analysis is based on industry data and practices obtained through trade press, industry reports, and interviews with media workers consistent with a critical media industries approach.