Water governmentalities: The shaping of hydrosocial territories, water transfers and rural–urban subjects in Latin America

Water governmentalities: The shaping of hydrosocial territories, water transfers and rural–urban subjects in Latin America
复制标题

水治理:拉丁美洲水社会领土、水传输和城乡主体的塑造

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Vos
J. Vos
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lena Hommes;R. Boelens;S. Bleeker;Bibiana Duarte;Didi Stoltenborg;J. Vos

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

随着城市用水量和污染的增加以及城市地区的扩大,对农村地区的影响日益加剧,因为农村地区是取水和废物处理区。为了解开这些水领土的动态,本文研究了交叉和重叠的福柯的“艺术的政府”(“政府")部署到输送水从农村到城市地区的三个拉丁美洲城市:利马(秘鲁),圣路易斯波托西(墨西哥)和布卡拉曼加(哥伦比亚)。我们研究传统的(水泥)水转移,广泛推广的生态系统服务计划的支付和他们的连接,结合奖学金的水文社会领域和治理。我们展示了如何特定的城市为基础的农村地区,他们的居民,规范,做法和身份成为嵌入在governmentality计划,以及如何这些是合理的,具体化和持续的,产生特定的enamerically城乡主体性。我们探讨这些如何被接受、谈判或争议。我们的应用governmentalities框架来分析农村-城市水资源转移的物质和社会政治影响,有助于现有的奖学金(重新)塑造农村-城市水社会领域的“隐藏的”和“无形的”主观化的工作。它还通过审查技术(包括物质基础设施)在创建农村主题方面的重要性,为政府的文献做出了贡献。
With increasing water consumption and pollution in cities and expanding urban areas, impacts on rural areas as water extraction and waste disposal zones are intensifying. To unravel these hydro-territorial dynamics, this paper studies the intersecting and overlapping Foucauldian ‘arts of government’ (‘governmentalities’) deployed to convey water from rural to urban areas in three Latin American cities: Lima (Peru), San Luis Potosí (Mexico) and Bucaramanga (Colombia). We examine conventional (cemented) water transfers, broadly promoted payment for ecosystem services schemes and their conjunction, combining scholarship about hydrosocial territories and governmentality. We demonstrate how particular urban-based imaginaries about rural areas, their inhabitants, norms, practices and identities become embedded in governmentality schemes, and how these are justified, materialized and sustained, producing particular entwined rural–urban subjectivities. We explore how these are accepted, negotiated or contested. Our application of the governmentalities framework to analyze the material and socio-political effects of rural–urban water transfers contributes to existing scholarship on the (re)shaping of rural–urban hydrosocial territorialities showing the ‘hidden’ and ‘invisible’ workings of subjectification. It also contributes to the literature on governmentalities by scrutinizing the importance of technology (including physical infrastructure) in creating rural subjects.
厄瓜多尔安第斯山脉生态系统服务水基金支付的领土和权限
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.016
发表时间: 2018
期刊: Geoforum
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Joslin, Audrey J.;Jepson, Wendy E.
通讯作者: Jepson, Wendy E.