Thinking about non‐being∗
Thinking about non‐being∗
复制标题
思考非存在＊
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1973
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Crittenden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Crittenden
存在对不存在的对象的真正引用，这可以通过用通用语言阐明引用并将列举的标准应用于写作和谈论小说时使用的表达来看出。虚构实体的概念在小说的“语言游戏”中被简单地接受，并且没有不受欢迎的本体论后果。如果不这样想，就是没有注意到这种谈话的概念地位。罗素、赖尔和奇泽姆对虚构话语的叙述是令人反感的。存在的概念是触及，和后果有关的参考抽象和其他对象，也涉及方法在本体论提到。
There are genuine references to non‐existent objects, as can be seen through elucidating reference in common language and applying the criteria enumerated to expressions used in writing and speaking about fiction. The concept of a fictitious entity is simply accepted in the adoption of the ‘language‐game’ of fiction and has no undesirable ontological consequences. To think otherwise is to fail to attend to the conceptual status of such talk. Accounts of fictional discourse by Russell, Ryle, and Chisholm are found objectionable. The concept of existence is touched on, and consequences concerning reference to abstract and other objects and also concerning method in ontology mentioned.