The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection
The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.002
复制
发表时间：
2014-07-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Kunde, Wilfried
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Janczyk, Markus;Kunde, Wilfried
哪些运动动作更适合取代最初计划但暂时不可执行的动作？先前的研究（Khan、Mourton、Buckolz、Adams 和 Hayes，2010 年，心理学学报）表明，解剖学限制似乎是此类选择的主要决定因素：例如，参与者更频繁地选择用与准备好的手指同源的手指进行响应。我们认为，在这种情况下，手指同源性与动作效果相似性相混淆，并且动作效果被认为在动作选择中起着至关重要的作用。我们报告了两个实验。实验 1 复制了 Khan 等人获得的结果。在实验2中，我们在范式中引入了视觉动作效果。该实验的结果清楚地表明，除了手指同源性状态对于选择频率效应之外，效应相似性也发挥着作用。 (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. 保留所有权利。
Which motor actions are preferred to replace an initially planned but momentary not executable action? Previous research (Khan, Mourton, Buckolz, Adams, & Hayes, 2010, Acta Psychologica) suggests that anatomical constraints seem to be a major determinant for such choices: For example, participants more frequently chose to respond with the finger homologous to the prepared one. We argue that in this case finger homology is confounded with action effect similarity, and action effects have been ascribed a crucial role in action selection. We report two experiments. Experiment 1 replicated the results obtained by Khan et al. In Experiment 2, we introduced visual action effects in the paradigm. Results from this experiment clearly point to a role of effect similarity in addition to mere finger homology status for the choice frequency effect. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.