Comparability of the Australian National Cancer Symptom Trials (CST) Group's Study Populations to National Referrals to Non-CST Specialist Palliative Care Services Participating in the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration.

Comparability of the Australian National Cancer Symptom Trials (CST) Group's Study Populations to National Referrals to Non-CST Specialist Palliative Care Services Participating in the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration.
复制标题

澳大利亚国家癌症症状试验 (CST) 小组的研究人群与全国转诊至参与姑息治疗结果合作的非 CST 专科姑息治疗服务的可比性。

DOI:
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.017
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
J Pain Symptom Manage.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Currow DC.
Currow DC.
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Matsuoka H;Allingham S;Fazekas B;Brown L;Vandersman Z;Clark K;Agar MR;Currow DC.

文献摘要

相似文献

结果902名癌症患者参加了17个地点的6项III期安慰剂对照、随机对照试验(表1)。在117个非CST研究中心观察到的75,240例癌症诊断患者的连续队列是对照人群。
ResultsNine hundred two people with cancer participated in six Phase III placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials across 17 sites (Table 1). A consecutive cohort of 75,240 patients with a cancer diagnosis seen in 117 non-CST sites were the comparator population.