Surveillance indicators and their use in implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Surveillance indicators and their use in implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive
复制标题

监测指标及其在实施海洋战略框架指令中的使用

DOI:
10.1093/icesjms/fsv131
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
M. Dickey‐Collas
M. Dickey‐Collas
中科院分区:
农林科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Samuel Shephard;S. Greenstreet;G. Piet;A. Rindorf;M. Dickey‐Collas

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

欧洲联盟海洋战略框架指令(MSFD)使用指标来跟踪与良好环境状况(GES)相关的生态系统状态。这些指标最初被认为是“可操作的”,即充分理解国家和具体的人为压力之间的关系(S),并有明确的目标。最近关于MSFD实施情况的讨论强调了另一类“监督”指标。监测指标监测生态系统的关键方面:第一,没有足够的证据来确定目标和支持正式的国家评估;和/或第二,与人为压力的联系不是很弱,就是没有足够的了解来支持具体的管理建议。监测指标不仅应直接跟踪与全球环境系统有关的状态,而且还应提供补充信息(包括警告信号),以呈现更广泛和更全面的状态图景,并为科学、政策和管理提供信息和支持。在这项研究中,我们(I)提出了一个将监测指标纳入活动-压力-状态-反应过程的框架,(Ii)考虑了一系列可能发挥这一监测作用的指标,以及(Iii)提出了评估候选监测指标表现的标准,这可能指导选择最有效的指标来执行这一功能。
The European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) uses indicators to track ecosystem state in relation to Good Environmental Status (GES). These indicators were initially expected to be "operational", i.e. To have well-understood relationships between state and specified anthropogenic pressure(s), and to have defined targets. Recent discussion on MSFD implementation has highlighted an additional class of "surveillance" indicators. Surveillance indicators monitor key aspects of the ecosystem for which there is: first, insufficient evidence to define targets and support formal state assessment; and/or second, where links to anthropogenic pressures are either weak or not sufficiently well understood to underpin specific management advice. Surveillance indicators are not only expected to directly track state in relation to GES, but also to provide complementary information (including warning signals) that presents a broader and more holistic picture of state, and inform and support science, policy, and management. In this study,we (i) present a framework for including surveillance indicators into the Activity-Pressure-State- Response process, (ii) consider a range of possible indicators that could perform this surveillance role, and (iii) suggest criteria for assessing the performance of candidate surveillance indicators, which might guide selection of the most effective indicators to perform this function.
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsr188
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
S. Greenstreet;H. Fraser;S. Rogers;V. Trenkel;S. Simpson;J. Pinnegar
通讯作者: S. Greenstreet;H. Fraser;S. Rogers;V. Trenkel;S. Simpson;J. Pinnegar