Psychotherapy research with ethnic minorities: Empirical, ethical, and conceptual issues
Psychotherapy research with ethnic minorities: Empirical, ethical, and conceptual issues
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0022-006x.69.3.502
复制
发表时间：
2001-06-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Hall, GCN
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hall, GCN
少数民族人口对心理治疗的需求日益增加。然而，没有足够的证据表明经验支持疗法（ESTs）对少数民族有效。道德准则建议修改心理疗法，使其在文化上适合少数民族。概念方法已经确定了相互依存，精神。文化敏感疗法（CST）的考虑因素。然而，有没有更多的经验支持CST的疗效比有对少数民族人口的EST的疗效。科技英语和科技英语研究之间的鸿沟是这两种传统中方法和研究人员差异的结果。科技委和EST研究人员之间的研究合作的具体建议。
There is an increasing demand for psychotherapy among ethnic minority populations. Yet, there is not adequate evidence that empirically supported therapies (ESTs) are effective with ethnic minorities. Ethical guidelines suggest that psychotherapies be modified to become culturally appropriate for ethnic minority persons. Conceptual approaches have identified interdependence, spirituality. and discrimination as considerations for culturally sensitive therapy (CST). However, there is no more empirical support for the efficacy of CSTs than there is for the efficacy of ESTs with ethnic minority populations. The chasm between EST and CST research is a function of differences between methods and researchers in these 2 traditions. Specific recommendations for research collaboration between CST and EST researchers are offered.