States and chiefs: are chiefs mere puppets?
States and chiefs: are chiefs mere puppets?
复制标题
国家和酋长:酋长只是傀儡吗?
DOI:
10.1080/07329113.1996.10756474
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. Nieuwaal
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Nieuwaal
Processes of state formation in Africa have taken various forms. This is true just as much for the post-colonial states as for the old African states that date from before colonial domination (Claessen and Geschiere 1984: 298). In Africa it is becoming clear what widely different forms a state can take. 1 This is why the results of the processes of democratization that were started in the years between 1989 and 1991, following the failure of the one-party system and the downfall of the marxist-leninist ideology, must be of great importance to the African citizen as well as to many researchers-although it must be noted that social and political welfare are at stake for the first, which is not the case for the latter. Whatever the outcome of these processes may be, it is clear that the African state, 2 just like any other state, is not shaped by a static principle. It is, on the contrary, constantly1 Just an example, among many others: During almost forty years of independence Ghana has had eight different governments and the country has seen almost all forms of constitution. Initially Ghana was a constitutional monarchy for a short period of time, it continued with a republican form of government, the country has had several presidential governments and a number of military regimes. A parliamentary democracy has functioned here for some time and there have been several proposals for democracies without parties.