Working bodies: interactive service employment and workplace identities
Working bodies: interactive service employment and workplace identities
复制标题
工作机构：互动服务就业和工作场所身份
DOI：
10.1080/13645579.2012.723347
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Dana Kaplan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dana Kaplan
从不同的角度看问题"（第106页）和实用主义是"愿意推迟一些怀疑，仍然使用材料的最佳可能的目的"（第107页）。从本质上讲，这种方法涉及到试图在相关性和严谨性之间取得平衡，以取得有意义的结果，同时认识到访谈记录提供的是"线索"而不是事实。第7章将阐述一系列对研究实践的影响，阿尔维森重申了他在第3章中对如何最好地进行访谈的任何建议的怀疑。然而，前一章包含了一些关于计划、进行和分析访谈的实际方面的有用信息。研究数据的严格分类和分类-例如，在扎根理论分析中-通常以牺牲创造性和批判性思维为代价，但这些活动并不相互排斥。它还建议，少依赖于访谈和更多的参与者观察可能有助于提高严谨性和去神秘化的研究情况。然而，这种方法提出了一些伦理和方法上的问题，没有得到充分的讨论。此外，没有提到其他方法，例如在访谈中或与访谈同时使用视觉方法，这可以作为"将经验材料视为思维或理论发展的灵感来源，而不是基础描述"（第8页）的一部分。口译面试实现了它的目标，要求一个更反射的方法比传统的管道视图的面试。这本书实际上是袖珍的，相对较短（152页），但代表了良好的物有所值。它将不适合许多新手研究人员，但应该推荐阅读任何人谁教或研究定性研究方法在先进的水平。
matter from different angles’ (p. 106) and pragmatism is ‘a willingness to postpone some doubt and still use the material for the best possible purpose(s)’ (p. 107). Essentially, this approach involves attempting to achieve a balance between relevance and rigour in order to achieve meaningful results, while recognising that interview accounts provide ‘clues’ rather than facts. A series of implications for research practice are set out in Chapter 7, where Alvesson re-states his scepticism from Chapter 3 of any advice on how best to conduct an interview. Yet, the earlier chapter contains some useful information on the practical aspects of planning, conducting and analysing interviews. It is suggested that rigorous sorting and categorisation of research data – for example, in grounded theory analysis – often take place at the expense of creative and critical thinking, but these activities are not mutually exclusive. It is also suggested that relying less on interviews and more on participant observation might help to enhance rigour and de-mystify the research situation. However, this method raises a number of ethical and methodological concerns that are not adequately discussed. Furthermore, there is no mention of alternative approaches such as the use of visual methods within or alongside interviews, which could be used as a part of ‘Viewing empirical materials as a source of inspiration for thinking or theory development rather than for a grounded description’ (p. 8). Interpreting Interviews achieves its goal of calling for a more reflexive approach than the conventional pipeline view of interviews. The book is virtually pocketsized and relatively short (at 152 pages), but represents good value for money. It will not be suitable for many novice researchers, but it should be recommended reading for anyone who teaches or studies qualitative research methods at advanced level.