Effect of strut thickness on neointimal atherosclerotic change over an extended follow-up period (≥4 years) after bare-metal stent implantation: Intracoronary optical coherence tomography examination
Effect of strut thickness on neointimal atherosclerotic change over an extended follow-up period (≥4 years) after bare-metal stent implantation: Intracoronary optical coherence tomography examination
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.007
复制
发表时间:
2012-04-01
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Akasaka, Takashi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kitabata, Hironori;Kubo, Takashi;Akasaka, Takashi
Background Neointima inside the bare-metal stents (BMSs) can transform into atherosclerotic tissue during an extended follow-up because of a persistent inflammatory reaction to the metal. We sought to investigate whether strut thickness may impact on the atherosclerotic change in neointima 4 years or more after BMS implantation using optical coherence tomography.Methods Forty-six stented lesions of 41 patients with BMS >= 4 years after implantation who underwent optical coherence tomography were enrolled in the study. The strut was defined as thin when less than 100 mu m and thick when >= 100 mu m. According to these criteria, stents were divided into 2 groups (thin strut n = 19, thick strut n = 27). Neointimal tissue was categorized into normal neointima, characterized by a signal-rich band without signal attenuation, or lipid-laden intima, with marked signal attenuation and a diffuse border. Intimal disruption, thrombus, and neovascularization were also evaluated.Results The mean period after implantation was 98.2 +/- 25.8 months in the thin-strut group and 91.1 +/- 22.8 months in the thick-strut group (P = .330). Lipid-laden intima (70% vs 32%, P = .016), thin-cap fibroatheroma-like intima (59% vs 16%, P = .0056), and intimal disruption (48% vs 16%, P = .031) were observed more frequently in the thick-strut group than in the thin-strut group, but no significant difference was observed in the frequency of thrombus. Although peristrut neovascularization was a common finding in both groups (thick vs thin 81% vs 79%, P = 1.000), the frequency of intraintima neovascularization tended to be higher in the thick-strut group (67% vs 42%, P = .135).Conclusions A thinner strut thickness may have favorable effects on neointimal atherosclerotic changes after BMS implantation. (Am Heart J 2012; 163:608-16.)