Hydroxyurea compared with anagrelide in high-risk essential thrombocythemia
Hydroxyurea compared with anagrelide in high-risk essential thrombocythemia
复制标题
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa043800
复制
发表时间:
2005-07-07
影响因子:
158.5
通讯作者:
Murray, M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Harrison, CN;Campbell, PJ;Murray, M
Background: We conducted a randomized comparison of hydroxyurea with anagrelide in the treatment of essential thrombocythemia.Methods: A total of 809 patients with essential thrombocythemia who were at high risk for vascular events received low-dose aspirin plus either anagrelide or hydroxyurea. The composite primary end point was the actuarial risk of arterial thrombosis (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral arterial thrombosis), venous thrombosis (deep-vein thrombosis, splanchnic-vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism), serious hemorrhage, or death from thrombotic or hemorrhagic causes.Results: After a median follow-up of 39 months, patients in the anagrelide group were significantly more likely than those in the hydroxyurea group to have reached the primary end point (odds ratio, 1.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.37; P=0.03). As compared with hydroxyurea plus aspirin, anagrelide plus aspirin was associated with increased rates of arterial thrombosis (P=0.004), serious hemorrhage (P=0.008), and transformation to myelofibrosis (P=0.01) but with a decreased rate of venous thromboembolism (P=0.006). Patients receiving anagrelide were more likely to withdraw from their assigned treatment (P