Brief fear of negative evaluation scale - Revised
Brief fear of negative evaluation scale - Revised
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/da.20142
复制
发表时间：
2006-01-01
影响因子：
7.4
通讯作者：
Asmundson, Gordon J. G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carleton, R. Nicholas;McCreary, Donald R.;Asmundson, Gordon J. G.
罗德博等人。 [2004: Psychol Assess 2:169-181]最近对负面评价的短暂恐惧量表（BFAE；Leary，1983：Psychol Bull 9：371-375）进行了验证性因子分析（CFA）。他们的研究导致出现了一个双因素解决方案，包括直接措辞的项目和反向措辞的项目。他们的结论是建议仅使用 BFNE 中措辞直接的项目。本研究的目的是通过复制和扩展来评估这一建议。参与者包括来自里贾纳大学和休斯顿大学的 385 名本科生，他们对问卷调查组进行了回答，其中包括 BFNE 或使用 Rodebaugh 等人提出的双因素模型的 BFNE 的修订版本（BFNE-II），支持他们的结论，即反向措辞项目包含一个单独的、基于方法论的因素。 BFNE-II 产生了一个可接受的单一模型，该模型符合 BFNE 的理论基础，并且不会因项目移除而导致敏感性丧失。其他分析表明使用 BFNE-II 而不是简化形式。
Rodebaugh et al. [2004: Psychol Assess 2:169-181] recently performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (BFAE; Leary, 1983: Psychol Bull 9:371-375]. Their study resulted in the emergence of a two-factor solution comprising straightforwardly worded items and reverse-worded items. They concluded by recommending use of only the straightforwardly worded items in the BFNE. Our intent in this study was to evaluate this recommendation through replication and extension. Participants included 385 undergraduates from the Universities of Regina and Houston, who provided responses to a questionnaire battery including either the BFNE or a revision utilizing straightforwardly worded versions of the reverse-worded items (BFNE-II). A CFA of the BFNE, using the two-factor model proposed by Rodebaugh et al., supported their conclusion that the reverse-worded items comprise a separate, methodologically based factor. However, CFA of the BFNE-II resulted in an acceptable unitary model that conforms to the theoretical basis for the BFNE, without risking loss of sensitivity from item removal. Additional analyses suggest use of the BFNE-II rather than a shortened form.