Selection and study performance: comparing three admission processes within one medical school
Selection and study performance: comparing three admission processes within one medical school
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/medu.12537
复制
发表时间：
2014-12-01
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Cohen-Schotanus, Janke
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schripsema, Nienke R.;van Trigt, Anke M.;Cohen-Schotanus, Janke
目的本研究的目的是：（i）分析是否学生被录取到一所医学院的基础上最好的大学预科成绩，一个自愿的多方面的选择过程，或彩票，分别在学习成绩不同;（ii）研究在多方面甄选过程中被接纳的学生的表现是否优于被拒的同学，和（iii）分析是否参与多方面的选择程序与绩效有关。方法我们检查了知识测试和专业分数，2009年、2010年和2011年被荷兰格罗宁根大学录取的三组医学生的学习进展和辍学情况（n=1055）。我们将抽签录取的学生分为没有参加的学生和在多方面选拔过程中被拒绝的学生。我们使用了ancova模型，逻辑回归和Bonferroni事后多重比较检验，并控制了性别和coherent.ResultsThe顶部大学预科年级组取得了更高的知识考试成绩和更多的一年级课程学分比所有其他组（p
ObjectivesThis study was conducted to: (i) analyse whether students admitted to one medical school based on top pre-university grades, a voluntary multifaceted selection process, or lottery, respectively, differed in study performance; (ii) examine whether students who were accepted in the multifaceted selection process outperformed their rejected peers, and (iii) analyse whether participation in the multifaceted selection procedure was related to performance.MethodsWe examined knowledge test and professionalism scores, study progress and dropout in three cohorts of medical students admitted to the University of Groningen, the Netherlands in 2009, 2010 and 2011 (n=1055). We divided the lottery-admitted group into, respectively, students who had not participated and students who had been rejected in the multifaceted selection process. We used ancova modelling, logistic regression and Bonferroni post hoc multiple-comparison tests and controlled for gender and cohort.ResultsThe top pre-university grade group achieved higher knowledge test scores and more Year1 course credits than all other groups (p